While Stanford is not my priority school but nevertheless I must highlight the lack of professionalism and student-centric approach by Stanford LLM Adcom. With a class size in double-digit, I cannot possibly understand what restricts them in effectively communicating decisions to the applicants. Other schools, (Berk, Columbia, Cornell, Harvard) with a larger intake have such a robust admissions process. If applicants(accepted or rejected) are given such hostile treatment by the Adcom, I am not sure if Stanford LLM is the right place. There's only so much the name and brand can do. The attitude of releasing decisions much after deposit deadlines of other colleges reeks of elitism and indicates a lack of care towards an applicants' time, energy, and finances. As the third/fourth best Law School, it can't behave as an arrogant first.
I can't agree more. From mid March till now, I still can't believe Stanford has nothing to provide to his candidates who at least paid $85 for their application. I will strongly advise my peers not to apply this school.
Btw, I was admitted to Harvard, you lost me, Stanford.
Hasn't it always been the case that Stanford releases its decisions more or less as the last school? Anyway, I believe that the main reason why SLS LLM decisions are not communicated in a streamlined manner, is because (i) they leave the final decision to the faculty and teaching fellow of each LLM specialization (not admission staff but academics); and (ii) for most programs these persons make a final selection based on phonecalls or short video chats scheduled and conducted by the teaching fellow. So it's a bit more personal and less consistent on timing, but in my case (ELP LLM) they communicated their offer well before Harvard's deadline.
SLS is all about a few tiny specialized LLM programs, a small but truly elite law school with a lot of really close contact with faculty, sunny weather and a relaxed, West Coast collaborative atmosphere
So I believe that you should consider SLS' LLM admission process as indicative of those features and the fact that it's indeed not a perfect machine dominated by non-academic staff, rather than misplaced arrogance/elitism.
[quote][quote]While Stanford is not my priority school but nevertheless I must highlight the lack of professionalism and student-centric approach by Stanford LLM Adcom. With a class size in double-digit, I cannot possibly understand what restricts them in effectively communicating decisions to the applicants. Other schools, (Berk, Columbia, Cornell, Harvard) with a larger intake have such a robust admissions process. If applicants(accepted or rejected) are given such hostile treatment by the Adcom, I am not sure if Stanford LLM is the right place. There's only so much the name and brand can do. The attitude of releasing decisions much after deposit deadlines of other colleges reeks of elitism and indicates a lack of care towards an applicants' time, energy, and finances. As the third/fourth best Law School, it can't behave as an arrogant first. [/quote]<br><br>I can't agree more. From mid March till now, I still can't believe Stanford has nothing to provide to his candidates who at least paid $85 for their application. I will strongly advise my peers not to apply this school.<br><br>Btw, I was admitted to Harvard, you lost me, Stanford. [/quote]<br><br>Hasn't it always been the case that Stanford releases its decisions more or less as the last school? Anyway, I believe that the main reason why SLS LLM decisions are not communicated in a streamlined manner, is because (i) they leave the final decision to the faculty and teaching fellow of each LLM specialization (not admission staff but academics); and (ii) for most programs these persons make a final selection based on phonecalls or short video chats scheduled and conducted by the teaching fellow. So it's a bit more personal and less consistent on timing, but in my case (ELP LLM) they communicated their offer well before Harvard's deadline.<br><br>SLS is all about a few tiny specialized LLM programs, a small but truly elite law school with a lot of really close contact with faculty, sunny weather and a relaxed, West Coast collaborative atmosphere :sunglasses: So I believe that you should consider SLS' LLM admission process as indicative of those features and the fact that it's indeed not a perfect machine dominated by non-academic staff, rather than misplaced arrogance/elitism.