Ok. As the only non-legal student or professional, I am having a hard time believing that in a forum full of barristers/lawyers, not one of you discussing distance programs has taken the time to fully understand the subject.
While the State Bar Association and the ABA can choose to take issue with this, the record is clear: most of these programs do not qualify as true correspondence programs based upon rules and laws that govern each of the states Board of Governors/Regents requiring for the delivery of a degree of higher education - bachelor's or otherwise. Do you know how you are able to skirt this issue and still issue a valid, recognized degree? its called residency period. Nearly all of the recognized U.S. based LL.M [and many of the MBA programs for that matter] programs require a period physical residency on the campus, as dictated by the program's need and the Board of Governors/Regents for that state. Now while it is much easier for the ABA to reject the notion of this "skirtting of the spirt of the law", for the state bar that is a little more dicey. So this is the reason for the emergence of programs like Northwestern & I.E.'s Executive LLM. I mean if you think about it, what is really the difference between these kinds of distance programs that require a 8-10 day meet up at the beginning of the year, and a professor who tell's you he doesn't take attendance and he will only have has his aides available as tutor's until the midterm, repeating the same afterwards until the final? Zero difference.
So suffice it to say, that the ABA will be on the ropes within 5-7 years about qualifiying foreign lawyers to practice, simply because the world becoming so interdependent, that very soon, you will need an adviser that is licensed in U.S. Tax Law as well as in South African Securities Law -- I know my fiancee will.
Ok. As the only non-legal student or professional, I am having a hard time believing that in a forum full of barristers/lawyers, not one of you discussing distance programs has taken the time to fully understand the subject.
While the State Bar Association and the ABA can choose to take issue with this, the record is clear: most of these programs do not qualify as true correspondence programs based upon rules and laws that govern each of the states Board of Governors/Regents requiring for the delivery of a degree of higher education - bachelor's or otherwise. Do you know how you are able to skirt this issue and still issue a valid, recognized degree? its called residency period. Nearly all of the recognized U.S. based LL.M [and many of the MBA programs for that matter] programs require a period physical residency on the campus, as dictated by the program's need and the Board of Governors/Regents for that state. Now while it is much easier for the ABA to reject the notion of this "skirtting of the spirt of the law", for the state bar that is a little more dicey. So this is the reason for the emergence of programs like Northwestern & I.E.'s Executive LLM. I mean if you think about it, what is really the difference between these kinds of distance programs that require a 8-10 day meet up at the beginning of the year, and a professor who tell's you he doesn't take attendance and he will only have has his aides available as tutor's until the midterm, repeating the same afterwards until the final? Zero difference.
So suffice it to say, that the ABA will be on the ropes within 5-7 years about qualifiying foreign lawyers to practice, simply because the world becoming so interdependent, that very soon, you will need an adviser that is licensed in U.S. Tax Law as well as in South African Securities Law -- I know my fiancee will.