Hello everyone! I have been admitted to the University of Chicago, NYU and Berkeley. Given the fact that due to its vast LLM class I am propably rejecting NYU, my great dilemma is now betwwen Berkeley and Chicago. Which one do you think would be better in an overall comparison?( prestige, cost, employment, prospects for a PhD, location, faculty)I would be interested in a specialisation on public and international law(e.g. human rights, administrative, public international etc.)Please help, decision seems more difficult as deadlines approach!
Chicago vs Berkeley
Posted Mar 21, 2010 06:07
Posted Mar 21, 2010 08:01
A friend of mine is studying at the NYU. He wants to go into diplomacy and wrote a human rights J.S.D. dissertation in Europe. He always tells me, how great it is and how perfect it fits into his career plans.
NYU would be the best choice in terms of career networking, too. The have a good career placement. Regarding employment, the east is better.
I think, you should reconsider, before you decline NYU's offer.
NYU would be the best choice in terms of career networking, too. The have a good career placement. Regarding employment, the east is better.
I think, you should reconsider, before you decline NYU's offer.
Posted Mar 21, 2010 09:18
I wouldn't turn down NYU for either of the schools. It has a great programme, though I understand that the class size may put people off.
Basically, I'd pick like this:
NYU - Berkeley - Chicago
.
Basically, I'd pick like this:
NYU - Berkeley - Chicago
.
Posted Mar 21, 2010 09:39
I would pick NYU. The class size is not that bad, if you pick the right classes.
Posted Mar 21, 2010 12:26
between Berkeley and chicago... what would you suggest ...for a career in law teachin
Posted Mar 21, 2010 12:40
For the school of economic law, Chicago is a no-brainer; for high-tech law, probably Berkeley is better. Just my 2 cents.
Posted Mar 21, 2010 21:52
IP Law: Berkeley
Law & Economics: Chicago
I think that the law & economics approach is better for a career as law school professor, because it's more generalistic and based on a more innovative methodology.
Law & Economics: Chicago
I think that the law & economics approach is better for a career as law school professor, because it's more generalistic and based on a more innovative methodology.
Posted Mar 21, 2010 22:10
what about a mix of courses on human rights, philosophy, foreign relations ... for teachin ... which would u suggest then
Posted Mar 21, 2010 22:30
I have a master in economics. and I think that you can analyse these topics perfectly with the concepts in modern law & economics. Chicago's L&E courses would be fascinating for you.
If you go to berkeley, you should go to the econ-departement. But I have no idea, if these courses need a BSc in mathematics or economics as prerequisite. however, berkeley is more IP law.
If you go to berkeley, you should go to the econ-departement. But I have no idea, if these courses need a BSc in mathematics or economics as prerequisite. however, berkeley is more IP law.
Related Law Schools
Hot Discussions
-
Stanford 2024-2025
Nov 07, 2024 35,074 117 -
Oxford 2025-2026 BCL/MSCs/MJUR/MPHIL/MLF
Nov 15 04:43 AM 2,057 44 -
NUS LLM 2024-25 Cohort
Oct 25, 2024 5,858 34 -
MIDS - 2024-25
Nov 15, 2024 1,838 16 -
NUS LLM cohort 2025/26
Nov 17 05:40 PM 472 5 -
LL.M. Scholarship Rates?
Nov 09, 2024 2,503 5 -
Scholarship Negotiation Strategy (BCL v. NYU LLM Dean's Graduate Scholarship)
Nov 09, 2024 1,041 4 -
NUS vs Peking
Nov 09, 2024 183 4