Sup guys.
I mean the way the faculty are administering the process is a sheer mess.
Admission is based solely on academic merit and a first in law from a red brick English university is an all but officially stated guarantee of admission - trust me on this one.
My tutor said he would investigate after the deadline had passed.
That makes it very unlikely that you will get in if your first is not from a red-brick, no matter how high your grades are?
After all surely Cambridge are virtually oversubscribed already once they have given places to those with firsts from red-brick+ and there are very few places left for those of us at rubbish universities? (I'm a mature student, only place that I could study was a non red-brick).
Do Cambridge publish any kind of admission statistics? Curious to look at this in more detail
That is not true at all and that logic really does not follow.
And I don't know what you mean about 'rubbish universities' - some of the best law students went to non-redbricks and go on to ace masters courses and become some fine practitioners and academics - I was taught by one myself on my year out.
There aren't sufficient applications from those with ACCRUED firsts from redbrick unis to fill up the offers at all.
And over 3 offers are made per place - the two largest groups who do not come are (i) internationals who don't get funding and (ii) people with firsts from redbricks who often go to other universities (virtually everyone who gets a BCL offer got a Cambridge offer - see the BCL thread from last year) and lots go off to do pupillages).
There probably are stats but I'm not familiar, sorry mate.
<blockquote><blockquote>Sup guys.
I mean the way the faculty are administering the process is a sheer mess.
Admission is based solely on academic merit and a first in law from a red brick English university is an all but officially stated guarantee of admission - trust me on this one.
My tutor said he would investigate after the deadline had passed.</blockquote>
That makes it very unlikely that you will get in if your first is not from a red-brick, no matter how high your grades are?
After all surely Cambridge are virtually oversubscribed already once they have given places to those with firsts from red-brick+ and there are very few places left for those of us at rubbish universities? (I'm a mature student, only place that I could study was a non red-brick).
Do Cambridge publish any kind of admission statistics? Curious to look at this in more detail</blockquote>
That is not true at all and that logic really does not follow.
And I don't know what you mean about 'rubbish universities' - some of the best law students went to non-redbricks and go on to ace masters courses and become some fine practitioners and academics - I was taught by one myself on my year out.
There aren't sufficient applications from those with ACCRUED firsts from redbrick unis to fill up the offers at all.
And over 3 offers are made per place - the two largest groups who do not come are (i) internationals who don't get funding and (ii) people with firsts from redbricks who often go to other universities (virtually everyone who gets a BCL offer got a Cambridge offer - see the BCL thread from last year) and lots go off to do pupillages).
There probably are stats but I'm not familiar, sorry mate.