Hi guys! Should those whose status has not been turned to PAO assume that they are unlikely to be considered for the central funding? Thanks!
Nothing is ever certain, but generally, the central funding has nomination deadlines fairly early (around late Jan/early Feb. They rarely have any reason (although I am sure reasons exist) to hold on to an applicant for longer after they have nominated someone, since being nominated already means that you should be among the most desirable candidates among those who will ultimately end up getting an offer (it is not clear how many are nominated for central funding, but it seems to be far less than those who get an offer - you would think they nominate everyone to give them a chance with the secondary Trust reviewers, but nope). This is why they will generally get their admissions first. Holding on to the candidates at this stage won’t really benefit anyone, as it also reduces their college admit chances. The only thing that is virtually guaranteed is that those who get admitted later than the others will not make it to the most popular colleges, as they tend to fill up very fast.
I wouldn’t emphasise central funding so much though. Barely half of the typical cohort would be centrally funded.
[Edited by Gobbledygook on Feb 17, 2022]
[quote]Hi guys! Should those whose status has not been turned to PAO assume that they are unlikely to be considered for the central funding? Thanks! [/quote]<br><br>Nothing is ever certain, but generally, the central funding has nomination deadlines fairly early (around late Jan/early Feb. They rarely have any reason (although I am sure reasons exist) to hold on to an applicant for longer after they have nominated someone, since being nominated already means that you should be among the most desirable candidates among those who will ultimately end up getting an offer (it is not clear how many are nominated for central funding, but it seems to be far less than those who get an offer - you would think they nominate everyone to give them a chance with the secondary Trust reviewers, but nope). This is why they will generally get their admissions first. Holding on to the candidates at this stage won’t really benefit anyone, as it also reduces their college admit chances. The only thing that is virtually guaranteed is that those who get admitted later than the others will not make it to the most popular colleges, as they tend to fill up very fast.<br><br>I wouldn’t emphasise central funding so much though. Barely half of the typical cohort would be centrally funded.