What is this concept of offers/PAO statuses being changed in batches? It should happen at random times right? Does Cam even have a batch-wise system? If so, when is the next batch likely?
I have heard that some people who had interviews were also turned down last week. That is scary to hear. There seem to be so many conflicting views atm, I've just given up. Some say that having an interview means that your are 'virtually' admitted, subject to serious mishaps during the interview and scholarship decisions.
Some others say that despite the interview, one can never be sure.
There is then the scenario where some don't get interviewed at all, and proceed directly to PAO.
Don't know how that happens, because some others don't have interviews and are directly rejected.
This leaves one in a real quandary - interviewed students, non-interviewed students all have the chance to be admitted or rejected. I think those interviewed can be slightly happier that atleast they were in the zone for having been spoken to. Those not interviewd really means that they were either so good/so poor that an interview was unnecessary! Please do keep us posted guys! Mine is still stuck at 'under review', gosh. And the more I hear of people of receiving offers, I get more anxious, haha
Interview does not mean “virtually admitted” - it means that the degree committee found it good enough to be sent to a potential supervisor to assess the viability of the proposal. If the supervisor already knows the person/project, there might be less of a need for an interview. If the supervisor does not, the question of whether there is a need for an interview or not will largely depend on whether the supervisor sees issues with the proposal that needs to be addressed or perhaps the supo wants to meet the candidate anyway. It should not be particularly surprising that candidates might be turned down after an interview. This could be for a number of reasons, e.g.: the supervisor not seeing the potential for a PhD in the proposal; the discovery that the proposal is too close to other projects/completed PhDs, thus not fulfilling the requirement of original research; the supervisor having received several candidates and only has capacity for one or two of them with no alternative supervisor to guide them, etc.
There is a “batch-esque” system of sorts. Cam gets some 200-300 applications per year for the PhD in law, our of which around 50 will get an offer (and around 20-25 ish will actually go there). Just like with the LLM admissions, they’ll prioritise the applicants nominated for central funding through the trust, gates, etc., since the nomination for these bodies are so early. The next ones will probably move to PAO closer to March. It’s all manual though, so there is bound to be some exceptions here and there. Rejections also tend to come not all at once, but that is also partly due to the “invisible waitlist”.
[Edited by Gobbledygook on Feb 17, 2022]
[quote]What is this concept of offers/PAO statuses being changed in batches? It should happen at random times right? Does Cam even have a batch-wise system? If so, when is the next batch likely? <br><br>I have heard that some people who had interviews were also turned down last week. That is scary to hear. There seem to be so many conflicting views atm, I've just given up. Some say that having an interview means that your are 'virtually' admitted, subject to serious mishaps during the interview and scholarship decisions. <br><br>Some others say that despite the interview, one can never be sure. <br><br>There is then the scenario where some don't get interviewed at all, and proceed directly to PAO. <br><br>Don't know how that happens, because some others don't have interviews and are directly rejected. <br><br>This leaves one in a real quandary - interviewed students, non-interviewed students all have the chance to be admitted or rejected. I think those interviewed can be slightly happier that atleast they were in the zone for having been spoken to. Those not interviewd really means that they were either so good/so poor that an interview was unnecessary! Please do keep us posted guys! Mine is still stuck at 'under review', gosh. And the more I hear of people of receiving offers, I get more anxious, haha [/quote]<br><br>Interview does not mean “virtually admitted” - it means that the degree committee found it good enough to be sent to a potential supervisor to assess the viability of the proposal. If the supervisor already knows the person/project, there might be less of a need for an interview. If the supervisor does not, the question of whether there is a need for an interview or not will largely depend on whether the supervisor sees issues with the proposal that needs to be addressed or perhaps the supo wants to meet the candidate anyway. It should not be particularly surprising that candidates might be turned down after an interview. This could be for a number of reasons, e.g.: the supervisor not seeing the potential for a PhD in the proposal; the discovery that the proposal is too close to other projects/completed PhDs, thus not fulfilling the requirement of original research; the supervisor having received several candidates and only has capacity for one or two of them with no alternative supervisor to guide them, etc. <br><br>There is a “batch-esque” system of sorts. Cam gets some 200-300 applications per year for the PhD in law, our of which around 50 will get an offer (and around 20-25 ish will actually go there). Just like with the LLM admissions, they’ll prioritise the applicants nominated for central funding through the trust, gates, etc., since the nomination for these bodies are so early. The next ones will probably move to PAO closer to March. It’s all manual though, so there is bound to be some exceptions here and there. Rejections also tend to come not all at once, but that is also partly due to the “invisible waitlist”.