The fact that a lot of people who have work experience apply does not mean that they explictly require work experience. Most of the people applying have work experience for the following reasons (1) Harvard LLM is very expensive so they might had to work for a few years; (2) maybe they decided that they needed a change of career/ or to develop their chances of getting a higher post in their current careers etc. I can assure you that they do not require work experience as I know a few people who went straight from law school; and they have explicitly told me that not having work experience does not mean you can't get admitted.
Hi all, A cousin of mine is in Harvard right now as an LLM student and she says pretty much what I believed all these years, that work experience is important which is why three-fourths of the present class have more than 2 years.
@law01, You are arguing like a fine-print lawyer. The fact that there are few people with no work background is good evidence a bias exists. Just because some people like that gain admission does not mean no consideration is given to work. It sounds like you are trying to convince yourself for reasons we do not know.
<blockquote>The fact that a lot of people who have work experience apply does not mean that they explictly require work experience. Most of the people applying have work experience for the following reasons (1) Harvard LLM is very expensive so they might had to work for a few years; (2) maybe they decided that they needed a change of career/ or to develop their chances of getting a higher post in their current careers etc. I can assure you that they do not require work experience as I know a few people who went straight from law school; and they have explicitly told me that not having work experience does not mean you can't get admitted.</blockquote>
Hi all, A cousin of mine is in Harvard right now as an LLM student and she says pretty much what I believed all these years, that work experience is important which is why three-fourths of the present class have more than 2 years.
@law01, You are arguing like a fine-print lawyer. The fact that there are few people with no work background is good evidence a bias exists. Just because some people like that gain admission does not mean no consideration is given to work. It sounds like you are trying to convince yourself for reasons we do not know.