Do you have an explanation? Are you suggesting that we are being discriminated against?
No koala, not at all. Quite the opposite actually, if any I think the problem may come from French universities. Let me explain.
French universities produce outstanding "students", not outstanding "individuals". The following is just speculation on admissions criteria but... being an excellent "student" will get you in top 14 US schools, like you and I did. Whereas, for the top 3, we're just "yet another excellent student", and that's probably not enough. They want to be impressed, they're looking for individuals that truly distinguish themselves from other equally brilliant lawyers.
And the problem with French universities is that the typical candidate will only have excellent grades in his favor. Even our "mentions bien and tres bien", while great to have... these distinctions are automatically awarded to anyone who reaches the pre-established GPA threshold. That doesn't contribute to setting someone apart.
One thing I've noticed is that candidates from other countries, often have on top of excellent grades, quite a list of "extra" and often non-academic achievements. Such as editor in their law school review, pro bono and community services organized by their college or their student organization, or specific awards i.e. "outstanding international student" or athletic distinctions, etc.
French universities seldom have initiatives to distinguish their students, in the form of awards or prizes (I did get one but that's remarkably uncommon).
For example, my brother who spent 4 years studying bio-medical engineering in Cleveland, obtained like 1 or 2 awards per year, most of them aren't serious by French standards as they reward his friendliness and dedication to helping other students, but that may be enough to make the difference with another candidate with equal grades.
In France, students don't do much at university, except well studying. The student organizations that do exist are either dedicated to organizing parties or are political offshoots of national parties or unionists.
Motivated students will also have summer internships in law offices and/or courts, and in my case I also worked in a law firm at the same time as my M1 and M2. But yet again, that's something you put in the "work experience" category of a resume. It won't really add "flavor" or a "this applicant really is out of the ordinary" effect on the admission committee.
And take the specific example of Yale. If what they say on their website is true and they only admit applicants interested in becoming law professors, then let's be honest here, any French applicant will have to lie to them. Indeed, graduating from Yale won't help you the slightest to secure a professor chair in France, it might actually be detrimental given how they are selected. (I can elaborate on this if someone reading this post isn't familiar with how law professors are selected in France)
As for Harvard, apparently a graduate from ENA was rejected. ENA is like the French equivalent of Yale in terms of percentage of graduates who become president/prime minister/minister (and only as far as that is concerned, I am in no way implying that ENA is the French equivalent of Yale in general). So again whatever they're looking for, being an outstanding "student" isn't enough.
And for Stanford, because of its focus on science and technology, I can definitely picture an engineer who graduated from Polytechnique or Centrale being accepted there after several years of professional experience. But such candidates are rare as they'd have to interrupt an already successful career, which would explain the low acceptance rate of French at SLS.
<blockquote>Do you have an explanation? Are you suggesting that we are being discriminated against?</blockquote>
No koala, not at all. Quite the opposite actually, if any I think the problem may come from French universities. Let me explain.
French universities produce outstanding "students", not outstanding "individuals". The following is just speculation on admissions criteria but... being an excellent "student" will get you in top 14 US schools, like you and I did. Whereas, for the top 3, we're just "yet another excellent student", and that's probably not enough. They want to be impressed, they're looking for individuals that truly distinguish themselves from other equally brilliant lawyers.
And the problem with French universities is that the typical candidate will only have excellent grades in his favor. Even our "mentions bien and tres bien", while great to have... these distinctions are automatically awarded to anyone who reaches the pre-established GPA threshold. That doesn't contribute to setting someone apart.
One thing I've noticed is that candidates from other countries, often have on top of excellent grades, quite a list of "extra" and often non-academic achievements. Such as editor in their law school review, pro bono and community services organized by their college or their student organization, or specific awards i.e. "outstanding international student" or athletic distinctions, etc.
French universities seldom have initiatives to distinguish their students, in the form of awards or prizes (I did get one but that's remarkably uncommon).
For example, my brother who spent 4 years studying bio-medical engineering in Cleveland, obtained like 1 or 2 awards per year, most of them aren't serious by French standards as they reward his friendliness and dedication to helping other students, but that may be enough to make the difference with another candidate with equal grades.
In France, students don't do much at university, except well studying. The student organizations that do exist are either dedicated to organizing parties or are political offshoots of national parties or unionists.
Motivated students will also have summer internships in law offices and/or courts, and in my case I also worked in a law firm at the same time as my M1 and M2. But yet again, that's something you put in the "work experience" category of a resume. It won't really add "flavor" or a "this applicant really is out of the ordinary" effect on the admission committee.
And take the specific example of Yale. If what they say on their website is true and they only admit applicants interested in becoming law professors, then let's be honest here, any French applicant will have to lie to them. Indeed, graduating from Yale won't help you the slightest to secure a professor chair in France, it might actually be detrimental given how they are selected. (I can elaborate on this if someone reading this post isn't familiar with how law professors are selected in France)
As for Harvard, apparently a graduate from ENA was rejected. ENA is like the French equivalent of Yale in terms of percentage of graduates who become president/prime minister/minister (and only as far as that is concerned, I am in no way implying that ENA is the French equivalent of Yale in general). So again whatever they're looking for, being an outstanding "student" isn't enough.
And for Stanford, because of its focus on science and technology, I can definitely picture an engineer who graduated from Polytechnique or Centrale being accepted there after several years of professional experience. But such candidates are rare as they'd have to interrupt an already successful career, which would explain the low acceptance rate of French at SLS.