Hi,
I am a dutch law student and i got accepted at UCL (LLM international commercial law), Warwick (international economic law), Manchester (international business law) and Nottingham (International commercial law). I think it will be either ucl or warwick, but i really do not know which one to choose. I have read loads about all of them, but the more information you get the more confused you get. Could someone give me some information about them? Thanks so much.
Damia

I would think your choices should rank in the following order
1) ucl
2) manchester
3) nottingham
4)warwick

1..warwick 2.. UCL 3..manchester

Tough call between UCL and Warwick, but does international recognition make UCL the slightly more attractive option? I must disclose that I know comparatively less about Warwick. However, if you want to do international business, is there any better place than London (despite the extreme cost)?

P. Martini

Well...I said warwick because it enjoys a grt reputation among the Recruiters....it is very well known throughout the world....one shud carefully select the modules of their course which shud be the first priority...I bank on Warwick because in india ( Iam an Indian) Warwick is better known among the recruiters and even in U.K it enjoys a grt reputation among the Co.. The fact tht it had the max. co. visits last yr is a gud enough example..besides living cost outside london is significantly lower..London is nt the world..there are grt universities outside London too who provide Int. business...nd if u spend soo much in London and nt end up with the job wats the use...nyways warwick doesnt give Int. Business..It has LLM in Corporate Law and for Corporate Law & Int. Eco. Law it is definitely better.