I have applied to both UCL and KCL i have been given an offer from KCL which i have accepted because i had to accept within one month and the one month has already lapsed but i am still expecting one from UCL. If i am giving an offer to UCL i would definitely accept. Is it wrong to accept both offers although i intend to write to KCL to tell them i dont want the offer again if i get the offer from UCL

don't worry =) its what all of us applicants do.
just make your choice before the relevant date and inform; im sure admission's departments have already assimilated the possibility of students rejecting offers but less so for the top tier unis.

out of pure curiousity, a question which obviously plagues all our minds is as betwenen UCL and KCL, what veers you toward the former and not the latter?

Rendition, I'm interested in knowing why you don't seem keen on accpeting the Cambridge offer you recieved?

hello miss bona fide! gosh my aquaintances with the 'factor' and his purchaser is something that to this say sends a shudder down my spine. a scar for life.
sigh its perplexing. and i do recognise I do have a month or so to decide.
some of the considerations that I have to personally deal with is - london (ive a home there. and familarity i believe is crucial to success in a way)

i'm an insular guy so i constantly wonder if cambridge will eat me alive.
also UCL's current crop of academics are simply the ones who have shaped the acadamic curve of my undergraduate experience. I mean you have no idea how much inspiration I have drawn from their words.
Thats not to say that cantab's are in any way inferior. Its just happenstance.

I would not be any less proud of going to ucl for instance. And i believe I can excel in both environments. but the question really is which is more conducive.

So there you go, do i make any sense? btw do you know anything about Peterhouse? i mean im in that college it seems, but i have no idea what the implications are?

I have got offers of LLM from these two,and already accepted UCL.Now I am wondering a bit if it's a great decison.
My interested area is jurisprudence/legal theory,and I plan to apply for Phd programme in oxbridge.
As a student from Taiwan, my imformation is poorly limited . It seems to me that UCL has a famous tradition of jurisprudence and ranks very high both in Law and generally. But KCL looks very good,too.
Could somebody help me out?

helloo ni hao ma
haha
i would go to UCL if i were you.
but then again this forum has labelled me as Mr UCL so yes if you wish to distinguish justifying a rule from justifying an action under it, go to UCL who knows ! i might see u there

btw i was reading the hart/raz dialectic written in chinese. omg that was mind blowing. my proficiency in the language is shite btw

helloo ni hao ma
haha
i would go to UCL if i were you.
but then again this forum has labelled me as Mr UCL so yes if you wish to distinguish justifying a rule from justifying an action under it, go to UCL who knows ! i might see u there

btw i was reading the hart/raz dialectic written in chinese. omg that was mind blowing. my proficiency in the language is shite btw

helloo ni hao ma
haha
i would go to UCL if i were you.
but then again this forum has labelled me as Mr UCL so yes if you wish to distinguish justifying a rule from justifying an action under it, go to UCL who knows ! i might see u there

btw i was reading the hart/raz dialectic written in chinese. omg that was mind blowing. my proficiency in the language is shite btw

Rendition,Thanks for the quick reply!
It's good to hear that you had a wonderful time at UCL.You can read the dialectic in chinese? Very impressive!

I guess 80% of me has been ready to go there,but the rest doesn't want to miss anything.
All opinions of others would be much appreciated !!

Hi jane.lin. I just sent you a PM with a few of my thoughts on your dilemma. (:

Hi,FleurDuMal Thanks a lot! I have sent you a PM.Check your mailbox please.