Hello everyone! I am going to apply for BCL this year.
For the essay submission, would it affect my application if the topic of my essay is different from the subjects which I indicated an interest in pursuing in my personal statement (e.g. submitting an essay on criminal law, while indicating an interest in commercial law in my personal statement)?
By the same token, do the fields which my referees specialize in have an impact as well?
Thanks so much!
Hi Yvonne!
I applied to Oxford and Harvard and had to submit a written work/ an essay on a legal topic for both. I ended up doing my LLM at Harvard.
My specialty is private international law/ civil procedure/ international arbitration but wrote on an issue from international criminal law.
My understanding is that choosing a different topic does not affect your of acceptance.
The purpose of an essay like this is to showcase your analytical thinking and writing skills, both essential in law. Law is a highly verbal pursuit, and a legal essay is a snapshot of your lawyering abilities. It allows the admissions committee to see your professional skills in action.
For top universities like Harvard and Oxford, it also serves as away to filter serious candidates, as crafting a strong legal essay demands significant effort and dedication. This means that fewer applicants will go through the trouble of doing it which narrows the pool of eligible candidates that the admissions committee will later have to sift through.
This is also my perspective I have after being on the side of the admissions committee (while doing my master's of research and PhD at the European University Institute).
I've written two very extensive posts on how to go about writing this part of the application, one on how to choose a topic and another on how to craft a compelling argument. They both are linked in my bio.
***
Regarding the referees:
Same logic here. The goal of a recommendation is to give the admissions committee something to rely on that's not your own words about yourself.
It is an evaluation of your professional and personal characteristics by someone who knows you well and can vouch for you. It is more important that this person knows you well and can say good things about you than a formal feature of what their field of expertise is.
Also, the things the referees are expected to talk about are usually transferable - how you've proven to be an excellent student, your talent and your hard work, your curiosity, research and writing skills, etc. The field where you do it is secondary.
I've created a course that goes in-depth into all aspects of a successful LLM application, including recommendations, please feel free to check it out. (also linked in my bio)
But the main point is to give the admissions committee evidence of your academic excellence and bright future that comes from someone other than you.
Hope it helps and best of luck! ;)
[quote]Hello everyone! I am going to apply for BCL this year.
For the essay submission, would it affect my application if the topic of my essay is different from the subjects which I indicated an interest in pursuing in my personal statement (e.g. submitting an essay on criminal law, while indicating an interest in commercial law in my personal statement)?
By the same token, do the fields which my referees specialize in have an impact as well?
Thanks so much! [/quote]
Hi Yvonne!
I applied to Oxford and Harvard and had to submit a written work/ an essay on a legal topic for both. I ended up doing my LLM at Harvard.
My specialty is private international law/ civil procedure/ international arbitration but wrote on an issue from international criminal law.
My understanding is that choosing a different topic does not affect your of acceptance.
The purpose of an essay like this is to showcase your analytical thinking and writing skills, both essential in law. Law is a highly verbal pursuit, and a legal essay is a snapshot of your lawyering abilities. It allows the admissions committee to see your professional skills in action.
For top universities like Harvard and Oxford, it also serves as away to filter serious candidates, as crafting a strong legal essay demands significant effort and dedication. This means that fewer applicants will go through the trouble of doing it which narrows the pool of eligible candidates that the admissions committee will later have to sift through.
This is also my perspective I have after being on the side of the admissions committee (while doing my master's of research and PhD at the European University Institute).
I've written two very extensive posts on how to go about writing this part of the application, one on how to choose a topic and another on how to craft a compelling argument. They both are linked in my bio.
***
Regarding the referees:
Same logic here. The goal of a recommendation is to give the admissions committee something to rely on that's not your own words about yourself.
It is an evaluation of your professional and personal characteristics by someone who knows you well and can vouch for you. It is more important that this person knows you well and can say good things about you than a formal feature of what their field of expertise is.
Also, the things the referees are expected to talk about are usually transferable - how you've proven to be an excellent student, your talent and your hard work, your curiosity, research and writing skills, etc. The field where you do it is secondary.
I've created a course that goes in-depth into all aspects of a successful LLM application, including recommendations, please feel free to check it out. (also linked in my bio)
But the main point is to give the admissions committee evidence of your academic excellence and bright future that comes from someone other than you.
Hope it helps and best of luck! ;)