From what I have read on past threads, nobody's self-service page has been updated just yet. If I am not mistaken, not even offer holders' - many of who seem to be still waiting for the admission pack to be dispatched to them.
On this forum, the only candidate who has received a negative response (after calling the office a week earlier) did get an email. Consequently, from what I gather, the Board of Graduate Studies does email unsuccessful candidates. It is more likely to learn of rejection by email than on self-service page, which Cambridge does not seem to update that promptly - to say the least.
I dare to construe that the admission process should be roughly based on the following logic:
- Both outstanding and inadequate applications have probably received an offer/rejection at a much earlier stage i.e. December/January (though, frankly, I haven't read of many unsuccessful applicants, but that may be only a matter of pride - when everyone on LL.M. guide is getting offers, it's just not that easy to write 'I haven't.')
- Borderline applications are compared against each other AS WE TYPE. There is only a limited number of places on the LL.M. programme, and as I am sure, everyone's application has its merits, one way or the other.
There are now two key factors that I feel we are left to lit candles and give up chocolate for:
A) It is likely that a number of outstanding applicants have also received offers from Oxford, Harvard, Yale, Columbia, NYU and so on. As incredibly as it is, Cambridge is somebody else's choice B or even C. When they decline their offer (which should be anytime between the time the offer was made and six weeks thereafter), Cambridge then pools less outstanding applicants. (And that would hypothetically be me since I am still waiting.)
B) It is my belief that all not-so-outstanding candidates have their appeal to Cambridge, otherwise it would have been easy for the Board of Graduate Studies to just push the 'reject' button and send everyone a polite automated email saying 'thanks but no thanks' in zero time.
I believe that what it really comes down to is the following. At present, the class of 2010 has already roughly formed. There must be a number of mature students, a number of international students, a number of european students and a so on (whichever the categories are). What it boils down to is: who is the class lacking of? Who is Cambridge looking for at this point? Which candidates do they have enough of? Are they looking for international students? Are they looking for home-students? Are they looking for qualified lawyers?
Whoever is the lucky candidate that matches the criteria we will never know about - not even through tarot I'm afraid, I sure wish it's you, and I sure wish it's me!
PS: Please don't take these speculations that seriously. These crazy patterns are what I come up with during the time I spend obsessing about Cambridge, which is dangerously increasing. It is not my intention to offend anyone or categorise. What I really want to say is: until we know, we don't. It is however a pleasure to share my worries and I wish I started earlier!
From what I have read on past threads, nobody's self-service page has been updated just yet. If I am not mistaken, not even offer holders' - many of who seem to be still waiting for the admission pack to be dispatched to them.
On this forum, the only candidate who has received a negative response (after calling the office a week earlier) did get an email. Consequently, from what I gather, the Board of Graduate Studies does email unsuccessful candidates. It is more likely to learn of rejection by email than on self-service page, which Cambridge does not seem to update that promptly - to say the least.
I dare to construe that the admission process should be roughly based on the following logic:
- Both outstanding and inadequate applications have probably received an offer/rejection at a much earlier stage i.e. December/January (though, frankly, I haven't read of many unsuccessful applicants, but that may be only a matter of pride - when everyone on LL.M. guide is getting offers, it's just not that easy to write 'I haven't.')
- Borderline applications are compared against each other AS WE TYPE. There is only a limited number of places on the LL.M. programme, and as I am sure, everyone's application has its merits, one way or the other.
There are now two key factors that I feel we are left to lit candles and give up chocolate for:
A) It is likely that a number of outstanding applicants have also received offers from Oxford, Harvard, Yale, Columbia, NYU and so on. As incredibly as it is, Cambridge is somebody else's choice B or even C. When they decline their offer (which should be anytime between the time the offer was made and six weeks thereafter), Cambridge then pools less outstanding applicants. (And that would hypothetically be me since I am still waiting.)
B) It is my belief that all not-so-outstanding candidates have their appeal to Cambridge, otherwise it would have been easy for the Board of Graduate Studies to just push the 'reject' button and send everyone a polite automated email saying 'thanks but no thanks' in zero time.
I believe that what it really comes down to is the following. At present, the class of 2010 has already roughly formed. There must be a number of mature students, a number of international students, a number of european students and a so on (whichever the categories are). What it boils down to is: who is the class lacking of? Who is Cambridge looking for at this point? Which candidates do they have enough of? Are they looking for international students? Are they looking for home-students? Are they looking for qualified lawyers?
Whoever is the lucky candidate that matches the criteria we will never know about - not even through tarot I'm afraid, I sure wish it's you, and I sure wish it's me!
PS: Please don't take these speculations that seriously. These crazy patterns are what I come up with during the time I spend obsessing about Cambridge, which is dangerously increasing. It is not my intention to offend anyone or categorise. What I really want to say is: until we know, we don't. It is however a pleasure to share my worries and I wish I started earlier!