JUST IN:
Fifth Circuit case involved an appeal filed by nonimmigrant
aliens whose status rendered them ineligible to sit for the
Louisiana Bar. In 2002, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that Lousiana Supreme Court Rule XVII Section 3(B) defined "resident alien" applied only to those aliens who had attained permanent resident status in the US."
The 81-page case is noteworthy because rarely does a case involve nonimmigrant alien attorneys as plaintiffs filing suit.
For the case, LeClerc, et. al v. Webb, No. 03-30752 (5th Cir. Jul. 29, 2005), see here. http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/cases/2005,1005-leclerc.pdf
Nonimmigrants Ineligible To Sit For Louisiana Bar Exam
Inactive User
Posted Oct 04, 2005 22:55
JUST IN:
Fifth Circuit case involved an appeal filed by nonimmigrant
aliens whose status rendered them ineligible to sit for the
Louisiana Bar. In 2002, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that Lousiana Supreme Court Rule XVII Section 3(B) defined "resident alien" applied only to those aliens who had attained permanent resident status in the US."
The 81-page case is noteworthy because rarely does a case involve nonimmigrant alien attorneys as plaintiffs filing suit.
For the case, LeClerc, et. al v. Webb, No. 03-30752 (5th Cir. Jul. 29, 2005), see here. http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/cases/2005,1005-leclerc.pdf
Fifth Circuit case involved an appeal filed by nonimmigrant
aliens whose status rendered them ineligible to sit for the
Louisiana Bar. In 2002, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that Lousiana Supreme Court Rule XVII Section 3(B) defined "resident alien" applied only to those aliens who had attained permanent resident status in the US."
The 81-page case is noteworthy because rarely does a case involve nonimmigrant alien attorneys as plaintiffs filing suit.
For the case, LeClerc, et. al v. Webb, No. 03-30752 (5th Cir. Jul. 29, 2005), see here. http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/cases/2005,1005-leclerc.pdf
Inactive User
Posted Oct 06, 2005 17:19
Thanks for the info! However, it's a li'l curious that this case came up in the first place. That particular provision is rather unequivocal and easily interpreted. I wonder if they had an angle to their argument though...
Whatever...it's probably Louisiana's loss...psshaaaaw!
Thanks for the info! However, it's a li'l curious that this case came up in the first place. That particular provision is rather unequivocal and easily interpreted. I wonder if they had an angle to their argument though...
Whatever...it's probably Louisiana's loss...psshaaaaw!
Whatever...it's probably Louisiana's loss...psshaaaaw!
Hot Discussions
-
Stanford 2024-2025
Nov 07, 2024 35,107 117 -
NUS LLM 2024-25 Cohort
Oct 25, 2024 5,860 34 -
MIDS - 2024-25
Nov 15, 2024 1,842 16 -
Harvard LLM 2025-2026
Nov 20 09:34 PM 1,747 7 -
Warwick or Birmingham
Nov 10, 2024 1,165 5 -
NUS LLM cohort 2025/26
Nov 17 05:40 PM 476 5 -
LL.M. Scholarship Rates?
Nov 09, 2024 2,506 5 -
Scholarship Negotiation Strategy (BCL v. NYU LLM Dean's Graduate Scholarship)
Nov 09, 2024 1,044 4