Hi everybody!
I've been admitted to both Columbia University and U Penn. What factors should I take into account in order to choose between these two excellent law schools, considering that i would like to stay in the US for a year or two after completing my degree. I'm interested in commercial law, and commercial and international arbitration.
Many thanks for your help.
Best regards.
Columbia vs. U Penn
Posted Feb 04, 2006 20:11
Hi everybody!
I've been admitted to both Columbia University and U Penn. What factors should I take into account in order to choose between these two excellent law schools, considering that i would like to stay in the US for a year or two after completing my degree. I'm interested in commercial law, and commercial and international arbitration.
Many thanks for your help.
Best regards.
I've been admitted to both Columbia University and U Penn. What factors should I take into account in order to choose between these two excellent law schools, considering that i would like to stay in the US for a year or two after completing my degree. I'm interested in commercial law, and commercial and international arbitration.
Many thanks for your help.
Best regards.
Posted Feb 04, 2006 21:01
When did you get your acceptance from Columbia ?
When was your application complete ?
When was your application complete ?
When did you get your acceptance from Columbia ?
When was your application complete ?
When was your application complete ?
Posted Feb 04, 2006 22:26
I would go to Columbia.
I would go to Columbia.
Posted Feb 05, 2006 01:29
I received my e-mail of admission from Columbia on January 17th and the letter i got several days after was also dated Jauary 17th. My complete file e-mail from Columbia was dated December 8th, 2005.
I received my e-mail of admission from Columbia on January 17th and the letter i got several days after was also dated Jauary 17th. My complete file e-mail from Columbia was dated December 8th, 2005.
fidelio
Posted Feb 05, 2006 02:11
Unlike Yale, Stanford or Harvard, Columbia reviews application files on a rolling basis, which is clearly the worst admission process possible.
Unlike Yale, Stanford or Harvard, Columbia reviews application files on a rolling basis, which is clearly the worst admission process possible.
Posted Feb 05, 2006 02:12
First of all, my congratulations! If i were in your place , i would choose Columbia,,,,,,,1) More prestigious 2) NY 3) More well-known brand
Regards
Regards
First of all, my congratulations! If i were in your place , i would choose Columbia,,,,,,,1) More prestigious 2) NY 3) More well-known brand
Regards
Regards
Posted Feb 05, 2006 02:56
Unlike Yale, Stanford or Harvard, Columbia reviews application files on a rolling basis, which is clearly the worst admission process possible.
"On a rolling basis"??? You mean they review the files in the order in which they are completed? If this information is accurate, it would mean that anyone who got an e-mail confirming completeness before December 8th and has not yet received an answer is rejected (since someone got an acceptance with a completeness notification on that date)?
<blockquote>
Unlike Yale, Stanford or Harvard, Columbia reviews application files on a rolling basis, which is clearly the worst admission process possible.</blockquote>
"On a rolling basis"??? You mean they review the files in the order in which they are completed? If this information is accurate, it would mean that anyone who got an e-mail confirming completeness before December 8th and has not yet received an answer is rejected (since someone got an acceptance with a completeness notification on that date)?
Unlike Yale, Stanford or Harvard, Columbia reviews application files on a rolling basis, which is clearly the worst admission process possible.</blockquote>
"On a rolling basis"??? You mean they review the files in the order in which they are completed? If this information is accurate, it would mean that anyone who got an e-mail confirming completeness before December 8th and has not yet received an answer is rejected (since someone got an acceptance with a completeness notification on that date)?
Posted Feb 05, 2006 14:09
Thank you Kem.
I agree with you on what you said about Columbia, but Penn has also some good points: 1) Ivy League School; 2) possibility of taking some courses at Wharton 3) a smaller program than Columbia 4) cheaper life than in NY...don't you think that these factors should also be taken into account?
I am wondering whether there is a real difference between these two schools when we consider the chances of finding a job in the US for a year after completing the LLL? Do you think it would be easier with a diploma from Columbia?
Regards.
I agree with you on what you said about Columbia, but Penn has also some good points: 1) Ivy League School; 2) possibility of taking some courses at Wharton 3) a smaller program than Columbia 4) cheaper life than in NY...don't you think that these factors should also be taken into account?
I am wondering whether there is a real difference between these two schools when we consider the chances of finding a job in the US for a year after completing the LLL? Do you think it would be easier with a diploma from Columbia?
Regards.
Thank you Kem.
I agree with you on what you said about Columbia, but Penn has also some good points: 1) Ivy League School; 2) possibility of taking some courses at Wharton 3) a smaller program than Columbia 4) cheaper life than in NY...don't you think that these factors should also be taken into account?
I am wondering whether there is a real difference between these two schools when we consider the chances of finding a job in the US for a year after completing the LLL? Do you think it would be easier with a diploma from Columbia?
Regards.
I agree with you on what you said about Columbia, but Penn has also some good points: 1) Ivy League School; 2) possibility of taking some courses at Wharton 3) a smaller program than Columbia 4) cheaper life than in NY...don't you think that these factors should also be taken into account?
I am wondering whether there is a real difference between these two schools when we consider the chances of finding a job in the US for a year after completing the LLL? Do you think it would be easier with a diploma from Columbia?
Regards.
Posted Feb 05, 2006 16:19
I suggest checking the top law firm websites and seeing where the foreign Associates went to school. My sense is that you would be better off going to Columbia.
I suggest checking the top law firm websites and seeing where the foreign Associates went to school. My sense is that you would be better off going to Columbia.
Posted Feb 05, 2006 16:58
Penn also has quite a number of advantages like price.
And if you got into the Wharton/Penn program, it is much better than Columbia IMO.
And if you got into the Wharton/Penn program, it is much better than Columbia IMO.
Penn also has quite a number of advantages like price.
And if you got into the Wharton/Penn program, it is much better than Columbia IMO.
And if you got into the Wharton/Penn program, it is much better than Columbia IMO.
Posted Mar 04, 2006 07:22
Having done LLMs in both the United States and the United Kingdom. These are my rankings for the best LLM programs in terms of prestige and job prospects. The first five is in no particular order:
(1) Oxford
(2) Cambridge
(3) Columbia
(4) Harvard
(5) Stanford
(6) NYU
(7) Georgetown
(8) Penn
(9) California-Berkley
(10) LSE
(1) Oxford
(2) Cambridge
(3) Columbia
(4) Harvard
(5) Stanford
(6) NYU
(7) Georgetown
(8) Penn
(9) California-Berkley
(10) LSE
Having done LLMs in both the United States and the United Kingdom. These are my rankings for the best LLM programs in terms of prestige and job prospects. The first five is in no particular order:
(1) Oxford
(2) Cambridge
(3) Columbia
(4) Harvard
(5) Stanford
(6) NYU
(7) Georgetown
(8) Penn
(9) California-Berkley
(10) LSE
(1) Oxford
(2) Cambridge
(3) Columbia
(4) Harvard
(5) Stanford
(6) NYU
(7) Georgetown
(8) Penn
(9) California-Berkley
(10) LSE
Posted Mar 04, 2006 08:29
no doubt cls esp. when you are thinking of job prospects...how many courses do yu expect from wharton in just one year llm course when yu are busy keeping up with law courses and maybe preparing for bar exam...
no doubt cls esp. when you are thinking of job prospects...how many courses do yu expect from wharton in just one year llm course when yu are busy keeping up with law courses and maybe preparing for bar exam...
Posted Mar 04, 2006 10:09
oops I forgot Yale. LSE and Cal tied for 10th
oops I forgot Yale. LSE and Cal tied for 10th
Posted Mar 04, 2006 11:49
Hi eowyn,
from my point of view, with respect to your interests Penn is the better choice. First of all, Penn is more business prone than Columbia. I believe that Columbia has its strengths more in the international law area. Secondly, Penn's program is significantly smaller (80 vs. 200 at CLS). Thus, the "cash-cow" factor might be of lower importance which results in better contacts with the faculty and other students. Furthermore, you may take courses at Wharton Business School. In addition, you live in a nice city with affordable living conditions and you still have every chance to visit NY.
The only thing about Penn is its lower ranking - so what? If you do not want to stay in the US forever, this is not of high importance.
Personally, I am a little sick by the "ranking game". You should have a look at the faculty and judge by what you find in terms of course variety and professors doing research you are interested in.
Regards,
Yps.
from my point of view, with respect to your interests Penn is the better choice. First of all, Penn is more business prone than Columbia. I believe that Columbia has its strengths more in the international law area. Secondly, Penn's program is significantly smaller (80 vs. 200 at CLS). Thus, the "cash-cow" factor might be of lower importance which results in better contacts with the faculty and other students. Furthermore, you may take courses at Wharton Business School. In addition, you live in a nice city with affordable living conditions and you still have every chance to visit NY.
The only thing about Penn is its lower ranking - so what? If you do not want to stay in the US forever, this is not of high importance.
Personally, I am a little sick by the "ranking game". You should have a look at the faculty and judge by what you find in terms of course variety and professors doing research you are interested in.
Regards,
Yps.
Hi eowyn,
from my point of view, with respect to your interests Penn is the better choice. First of all, Penn is more business prone than Columbia. I believe that Columbia has its strengths more in the international law area. Secondly, Penn's program is significantly smaller (80 vs. 200 at CLS). Thus, the "cash-cow" factor might be of lower importance which results in better contacts with the faculty and other students. Furthermore, you may take courses at Wharton Business School. In addition, you live in a nice city with affordable living conditions and you still have every chance to visit NY.
The only thing about Penn is its lower ranking - so what? If you do not want to stay in the US forever, this is not of high importance.
Personally, I am a little sick by the "ranking game". You should have a look at the faculty and judge by what you find in terms of course variety and professors doing research you are interested in.
Regards,
Yps.
from my point of view, with respect to your interests Penn is the better choice. First of all, Penn is more business prone than Columbia. I believe that Columbia has its strengths more in the international law area. Secondly, Penn's program is significantly smaller (80 vs. 200 at CLS). Thus, the "cash-cow" factor might be of lower importance which results in better contacts with the faculty and other students. Furthermore, you may take courses at Wharton Business School. In addition, you live in a nice city with affordable living conditions and you still have every chance to visit NY.
The only thing about Penn is its lower ranking - so what? If you do not want to stay in the US forever, this is not of high importance.
Personally, I am a little sick by the "ranking game". You should have a look at the faculty and judge by what you find in terms of course variety and professors doing research you are interested in.
Regards,
Yps.
Posted Mar 04, 2006 21:21
slightly off the issue, sorry- but have many people heard back from Columbia? i got an email saying they had received my application on 19 january. i ask because i have two other offers so even if columbia come back in the negative, at least i could make a proper decision. thanks
slightly off the issue, sorry- but have many people heard back from Columbia? i got an email saying they had received my application on 19 january. i ask because i have two other offers so even if columbia come back in the negative, at least i could make a proper decision. thanks
Posted Mar 04, 2006 21:30
Having done LLMs in both the United States and the United Kingdom. These are my rankings for the best LLM programs in terms of prestige and job prospects. The first five is in no particular order:
(1) Oxford
(2) Cambridge
(3) Columbia
(4) Harvard
(5) Stanford
(6) NYU
(7) Georgetown
(8) Penn
(9) California-Berkley
(10) LSE
would you actually put oxford and cambridge and lse in with the american colleges? im irish so i know how highly regarded at least the first two are (for law) but i would not have thought they those colleges would be so highly regarded in the States? would they stand to you in terms of getting a job in the States?
<blockquote>Having done LLMs in both the United States and the United Kingdom. These are my rankings for the best LLM programs in terms of prestige and job prospects. The first five is in no particular order:
(1) Oxford
(2) Cambridge
(3) Columbia
(4) Harvard
(5) Stanford
(6) NYU
(7) Georgetown
(8) Penn
(9) California-Berkley
(10) LSE</blockquote>
would you actually put oxford and cambridge and lse in with the american colleges? im irish so i know how highly regarded at least the first two are (for law) but i would not have thought they those colleges would be so highly regarded in the States? would they stand to you in terms of getting a job in the States?
(1) Oxford
(2) Cambridge
(3) Columbia
(4) Harvard
(5) Stanford
(6) NYU
(7) Georgetown
(8) Penn
(9) California-Berkley
(10) LSE</blockquote>
would you actually put oxford and cambridge and lse in with the american colleges? im irish so i know how highly regarded at least the first two are (for law) but i would not have thought they those colleges would be so highly regarded in the States? would they stand to you in terms of getting a job in the States?
Posted Mar 05, 2006 01:59
Definately not. I was looking at worldwide job prospects. If you want to work in the United States, it is definately better to do an LLM in the US and do not even think about doing the LLM in the UK unless you are an American citizen.
People always ask me which system is better. What I always tell them is that a US LLM prepares you better to work in the US than the UK LLM prepares you to work in the UK, however the UK LLM prepares you much better to work around the world as the LLMs in the UK often examine how the law is in different countries (mostly other common law countries and the EU) while the LLMs in the US are taught with the JDs and deal with US Federal and State law.
If you do an LLM in Cambridge, I believe it is much easier to get a job in the UK if you come from a common law background than for example an LLM from Columbia would help you in the US. I had two friends who were the top law students in my system. One went to Columbia, the other went to Cambridge, the person who went to Cambridge got a job within two months of graduating while the person who went to Columbia took about a year and ended up having to do the JD. However the salary for the Columbia student was definately much higher than the Cambridge grad. In other words good things will come to those who wait.
People always ask me which system is better. What I always tell them is that a US LLM prepares you better to work in the US than the UK LLM prepares you to work in the UK, however the UK LLM prepares you much better to work around the world as the LLMs in the UK often examine how the law is in different countries (mostly other common law countries and the EU) while the LLMs in the US are taught with the JDs and deal with US Federal and State law.
If you do an LLM in Cambridge, I believe it is much easier to get a job in the UK if you come from a common law background than for example an LLM from Columbia would help you in the US. I had two friends who were the top law students in my system. One went to Columbia, the other went to Cambridge, the person who went to Cambridge got a job within two months of graduating while the person who went to Columbia took about a year and ended up having to do the JD. However the salary for the Columbia student was definately much higher than the Cambridge grad. In other words good things will come to those who wait.
Definately not. I was looking at worldwide job prospects. If you want to work in the United States, it is definately better to do an LLM in the US and do not even think about doing the LLM in the UK unless you are an American citizen.
People always ask me which system is better. What I always tell them is that a US LLM prepares you better to work in the US than the UK LLM prepares you to work in the UK, however the UK LLM prepares you much better to work around the world as the LLMs in the UK often examine how the law is in different countries (mostly other common law countries and the EU) while the LLMs in the US are taught with the JDs and deal with US Federal and State law.
If you do an LLM in Cambridge, I believe it is much easier to get a job in the UK if you come from a common law background than for example an LLM from Columbia would help you in the US. I had two friends who were the top law students in my system. One went to Columbia, the other went to Cambridge, the person who went to Cambridge got a job within two months of graduating while the person who went to Columbia took about a year and ended up having to do the JD. However the salary for the Columbia student was definately much higher than the Cambridge grad. In other words good things will come to those who wait.
People always ask me which system is better. What I always tell them is that a US LLM prepares you better to work in the US than the UK LLM prepares you to work in the UK, however the UK LLM prepares you much better to work around the world as the LLMs in the UK often examine how the law is in different countries (mostly other common law countries and the EU) while the LLMs in the US are taught with the JDs and deal with US Federal and State law.
If you do an LLM in Cambridge, I believe it is much easier to get a job in the UK if you come from a common law background than for example an LLM from Columbia would help you in the US. I had two friends who were the top law students in my system. One went to Columbia, the other went to Cambridge, the person who went to Cambridge got a job within two months of graduating while the person who went to Columbia took about a year and ended up having to do the JD. However the salary for the Columbia student was definately much higher than the Cambridge grad. In other words good things will come to those who wait.
Posted Mar 05, 2006 15:43
Having done LLMs in both the United States and the United Kingdom. These are my rankings for the best LLM programs in terms of prestige and job prospects. The first five is in no particular order:
(1) Oxford
(2) Cambridge
(3) Columbia
(4) Harvard
(5) Stanford
(6) NYU
(7) Georgetown
(8) Penn
(9) California-Berkley
(10) LSE
I cant comment on job prospects, but concerning prestige, I would put Chicago on that list for sure.
<blockquote>Having done LLMs in both the United States and the United Kingdom. These are my rankings for the best LLM programs in terms of prestige and job prospects. The first five is in no particular order:
(1) Oxford
(2) Cambridge
(3) Columbia
(4) Harvard
(5) Stanford
(6) NYU
(7) Georgetown
(8) Penn
(9) California-Berkley
(10) LSE</blockquote>
I cant comment on job prospects, but concerning prestige, I would put Chicago on that list for sure.
(1) Oxford
(2) Cambridge
(3) Columbia
(4) Harvard
(5) Stanford
(6) NYU
(7) Georgetown
(8) Penn
(9) California-Berkley
(10) LSE</blockquote>
I cant comment on job prospects, but concerning prestige, I would put Chicago on that list for sure.
Posted Mar 05, 2006 17:37
Interesting post ba.
Would you recommend a LLM in USA or in UK for a law student trained in a civil law system ?
Would you recommend a LLM in USA or in UK for a law student trained in a civil law system ?
Definately not. I was looking at worldwide job prospects. If you want to work in the United States, it is definately better to do an LLM in the US and do not even think about doing the LLM in the UK unless you are an American citizen.
People always ask me which system is better. What I always tell them is that a US LLM prepares you better to work in the US than the UK LLM prepares you to work in the UK, however the UK LLM prepares you much better to work around the world as the LLMs in the UK often examine how the law is in different countries (mostly other common law countries and the EU) while the LLMs in the US are taught with the JDs and deal with US Federal and State law.
If you do an LLM in Cambridge, I believe it is much easier to get a job in the UK if you come from a common law background than for example an LLM from Columbia would help you in the US. I had two friends who were the top law students in my system. One went to Columbia, the other went to Cambridge, the person who went to Cambridge got a job within two months of graduating while the person who went to Columbia took about a year and ended up having to do the JD. However the salary for the Columbia student was definately much higher than the Cambridge grad. In other words good things will come to those who wait.
Interesting post ba.
Would you recommend a LLM in USA or in UK for a law student trained in a civil law system ?
<blockquote>Definately not. I was looking at worldwide job prospects. If you want to work in the United States, it is definately better to do an LLM in the US and do not even think about doing the LLM in the UK unless you are an American citizen.
People always ask me which system is better. What I always tell them is that a US LLM prepares you better to work in the US than the UK LLM prepares you to work in the UK, however the UK LLM prepares you much better to work around the world as the LLMs in the UK often examine how the law is in different countries (mostly other common law countries and the EU) while the LLMs in the US are taught with the JDs and deal with US Federal and State law.
If you do an LLM in Cambridge, I believe it is much easier to get a job in the UK if you come from a common law background than for example an LLM from Columbia would help you in the US. I had two friends who were the top law students in my system. One went to Columbia, the other went to Cambridge, the person who went to Cambridge got a job within two months of graduating while the person who went to Columbia took about a year and ended up having to do the JD. However the salary for the Columbia student was definately much higher than the Cambridge grad. In other words good things will come to those who wait.</blockquote>
Would you recommend a LLM in USA or in UK for a law student trained in a civil law system ?
<blockquote>Definately not. I was looking at worldwide job prospects. If you want to work in the United States, it is definately better to do an LLM in the US and do not even think about doing the LLM in the UK unless you are an American citizen.
People always ask me which system is better. What I always tell them is that a US LLM prepares you better to work in the US than the UK LLM prepares you to work in the UK, however the UK LLM prepares you much better to work around the world as the LLMs in the UK often examine how the law is in different countries (mostly other common law countries and the EU) while the LLMs in the US are taught with the JDs and deal with US Federal and State law.
If you do an LLM in Cambridge, I believe it is much easier to get a job in the UK if you come from a common law background than for example an LLM from Columbia would help you in the US. I had two friends who were the top law students in my system. One went to Columbia, the other went to Cambridge, the person who went to Cambridge got a job within two months of graduating while the person who went to Columbia took about a year and ended up having to do the JD. However the salary for the Columbia student was definately much higher than the Cambridge grad. In other words good things will come to those who wait.</blockquote>
Posted Mar 05, 2006 18:09
It depends on the civil law system you are from. If you are from Latin America, you should do the LLM in the US, if you are from Europe and intend to stay there, I would recommend the UK especially because comparative law teaching is so good in the UK.
The US is an excellent place to study, but the fact remains a job is not guaranteed when you finish plus the costs are very high (I was a Fulbright LLM student so I had to go back home, however alot of my classmates took a long while to get jobs) basically a person who does an LLM in the UK who is from Europe will get a job once they are finished (no work permit problems) once they go to a top 5 program in the UK this is not the same for the US where the large law firms often expressly or implicity insist on you eventually doing the JD after the LLM, I know it has happened to a number of people I know.
The University of Chicago is an excellent program but the fact is like in all LLM programs in the US you have to carefully choose your courses. Duke is also a good program as well as Yale but Yale is more for people who are committed to law teaching.
The US is an excellent place to study, but the fact remains a job is not guaranteed when you finish plus the costs are very high (I was a Fulbright LLM student so I had to go back home, however alot of my classmates took a long while to get jobs) basically a person who does an LLM in the UK who is from Europe will get a job once they are finished (no work permit problems) once they go to a top 5 program in the UK this is not the same for the US where the large law firms often expressly or implicity insist on you eventually doing the JD after the LLM, I know it has happened to a number of people I know.
The University of Chicago is an excellent program but the fact is like in all LLM programs in the US you have to carefully choose your courses. Duke is also a good program as well as Yale but Yale is more for people who are committed to law teaching.
It depends on the civil law system you are from. If you are from Latin America, you should do the LLM in the US, if you are from Europe and intend to stay there, I would recommend the UK especially because comparative law teaching is so good in the UK.
The US is an excellent place to study, but the fact remains a job is not guaranteed when you finish plus the costs are very high (I was a Fulbright LLM student so I had to go back home, however alot of my classmates took a long while to get jobs) basically a person who does an LLM in the UK who is from Europe will get a job once they are finished (no work permit problems) once they go to a top 5 program in the UK this is not the same for the US where the large law firms often expressly or implicity insist on you eventually doing the JD after the LLM, I know it has happened to a number of people I know.
The University of Chicago is an excellent program but the fact is like in all LLM programs in the US you have to carefully choose your courses. Duke is also a good program as well as Yale but Yale is more for people who are committed to law teaching.
The US is an excellent place to study, but the fact remains a job is not guaranteed when you finish plus the costs are very high (I was a Fulbright LLM student so I had to go back home, however alot of my classmates took a long while to get jobs) basically a person who does an LLM in the UK who is from Europe will get a job once they are finished (no work permit problems) once they go to a top 5 program in the UK this is not the same for the US where the large law firms often expressly or implicity insist on you eventually doing the JD after the LLM, I know it has happened to a number of people I know.
The University of Chicago is an excellent program but the fact is like in all LLM programs in the US you have to carefully choose your courses. Duke is also a good program as well as Yale but Yale is more for people who are committed to law teaching.
Related Law Schools
New York City, New York
1125 Followers
961 Discussions
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
684 Followers
455 Discussions
Hot Discussions
-
LLM UCL / KCL / LSE / QMUL 2018-19
Aug 29, 2018 54604 371 -
Yale 2015-2016
Sep 12, 2018 17009 86 -
Osgoode PD - York University, Canadian Common Law 2018 - 2019
Sep 16, 2018 1702 25 -
Foreign attorney cleared california bar
Sep 04, 2018 4045 11 -
KU LEUVEN Intellectual Property and ICT Law 2018/2019
Aug 25, 2018 439 9 -
Is one-month enough to write a good SOP?
Aug 27, 2018 329 7 -
Postgraduate LLM Academic Reference
Aug 22, 2018 352 5 -
University of East Anglia or University of Dundee for LLM in International Commercial and Business Laws
Aug 31, 2018 172 5
