Hi there,

I have applied to QMU and UCL. I ve got an offer from Queen Mary but I am still waiting for the answer from UCL.
Anyway, which of the two schools do you think is better for Intellectual Property Law?

Thanx for your comments...

Same situation here + also accepted in Kings.

I don't know how long I will have to wait for UCL - they told me a few weeks yesterday over the phone

I really don't know what I should do. I'll have to choose between Kings and QM if UCL rejects me, or between the three if UCL accpets me, even though I think I would go to UCL in that situation

Tough question.

UCL has a far better overall reputation in law than QM. On the other hand, I heard that QM had a good reputation in intellectual property law. I do not know about the UCL's reputation in this field.

This is exactly my dilemma - should I go for the overall or for the field specific reputation?

But I know that the UCL Prof for IP is very reputed too - he is a former judge

Hey SVD and Johnson, thanks so far for your comments.
I was also wondering about how many students will be joining the LL.M. programme in total - I heard the UCL programme was quite large but what about QM? Anyone has any numbers?

Regards,

Tim

P.S. where are you guys from?