Hi. I am interested in what the consensus is in regards to UK LLM's (or BCL), purely in terms of future career opportunities - i.e. commercial, not academic - in London/and the world. Assuming I got could go to any of: Oxford/Cambridge, or KCL, UCL, LSE and do an LLM, which would be look best to potential employers?
Also on a secondary note: would it be better career wise to take a year off and do LLM/BCL at Oxbridge, then get back into work, or work in London and do a two year LLM from one of the London schools?
Financial and academic entry considerations are not needed, let us assume I can afford to study anywhere, as well as get in.
Thanks
Oxbridge vs London LLM's
Posted Dec 02, 2008 17:31
Also on a secondary note: would it be better career wise to take a year off and do LLM/BCL at Oxbridge, then get back into work, or work in London and do a two year LLM from one of the London schools?
Financial and academic entry considerations are not needed, let us assume I can afford to study anywhere, as well as get in.
Thanks
Posted Dec 02, 2008 17:47
...
Posted Dec 02, 2008 17:56
I have done my degree from South Africa
Posted Dec 02, 2008 18:14
...
Posted Dec 02, 2008 18:46
Personally, I'd say that all are much of a muchness. Really, it depends if you want a general qualification or you particularly want to specialise in a subject area.
Either pt or ft study would be equally well thought of. Perhaps it is easier to remain on an academic path and get it all done at once ft but if you can find a supportive employer then pt study shows you can manage your time well.
Either pt or ft study would be equally well thought of. Perhaps it is easier to remain on an academic path and get it all done at once ft but if you can find a supportive employer then pt study shows you can manage your time well.
Posted Dec 03, 2008 16:40
no comments from the author of the post???
Posted Dec 03, 2008 18:11
I wouldn't worry about the employability of the different LLM degrees. It is mainly about getting to an interview stage. If you have a LLM from a prestigious University on your CV then it will get you an interview, but certainly will not get you a job on its own (nor will it be down to any institutional hierarchy). It is a foot in the door to then impress in interview (or whatever other means of assessment they will use). On that basis, I wouldn't suggest that there is much difference between the top end Universities in that regard.
Posted Dec 03, 2008 18:39
I'm not clear about the reference to two years in London. Are you hypothesising doing a two year masters programme (i.e. Bologna compliant), or working part-time and doing the LLM part-time. If the latter, I'm not convinced that's a good idea because neither 'half' of your life is likely to fit in to 50% of your time, whether you are working as a barrista or baby barrister. If you can afford it, devote your energies to the academic programme - you will enjoy it more, are likely to learn more and end up with better grades and thus more likely to impress. If you are looking at a Bologna compliant masters, I'm guessing that has the advantage of taking you further through any recession/depression in a useful sort of way.
Related Law Schools
Hot Discussions
-
Cambridge LL.M. Applicants 2024-2025
Oct 30, 2024 142,359 544 -
Georgetown LLM 2024/2025 applicants
Nov 16 09:22 PM 40,124 209 -
NUS LLM 2024-25 Cohort
Oct 25, 2024 5,858 34 -
MIDS - 2024-25
Nov 15, 2024 1,838 16 -
Indian Tribes as US Jurisdictions of law attorney admission?
Nov 08, 2024 766 6 -
NUS LLM cohort 2025/26
Nov 17 05:40 PM 472 5 -
Scholarship Negotiation Strategy (BCL v. NYU LLM Dean's Graduate Scholarship)
Nov 09, 2024 1,042 4 -
LLM in ADR
Oct 23, 2024 390 4