Hey, I am very much interested in Intellectual Property Law and Commercial law, I note that the captioned universities require 2:1, but I didn't get a good grade in my udnergraduate i.e. 2:2 with most of my subjects at B grade. I possess of 5 years' working experience. Do you know whether there is any successful case for applicant with 2:2 class and working experience enrolling into the captioned 4 universities?
Admission of UCL, LSE, QMUL and KCL from Second Lower Class
Posted Sep 09, 2009 10:52
Posted Sep 09, 2009 12:41
No chance at LSE and KCL, medium chance at UCL, very good chance at QM.
Posted Sep 09, 2009 12:44
Not sure about the others but LSE often makes offers of admission conditional on a first class honours degree, so unless your work experience is very ''stand out'' or highly consistent with your proposed program of study you may be in trouble.
Posted Sep 09, 2009 12:46
Hey Banking just wondering why you would rate his chances more highly at UCL than KCl? Had always been under the impression that UCL was slightly more highly regarded and more stringent on admissions?
Posted Sep 09, 2009 13:08
About the same as far as law faculty goes, however, KCL ia a bit more elitist and sometimes prefers Brit students rather than international ones (they were several cases of either Asian or African students accusing KCL of discrimination, mind you most were in their medical school-check the net). KCL sees itself as an arch-rival of the LSE and Imperial College (in medicine). UCL is more democratic but by accepting more overseas students with different grading systems they have to be more flexible with their entry standards
Posted Sep 09, 2009 14:20
Ok interesting! Cheers!
Posted Sep 09, 2009 18:56
About the same as far as law faculty goes, however, KCL ia a bit more elitist and sometimes prefers Brit students rather than international ones (they were several cases of either Asian or African students accusing KCL of discrimination, mind you most were in their medical school-check the net). KCL sees itself as an arch-rival of the LSE and Imperial College (in medicine). UCL is more democratic but by accepting more overseas students with different grading systems they have to be more flexible with their entry standards
Are obscure grudges/controversies in the medical department relevant here?
Are obscure grudges/controversies in the medical department relevant here?
Posted Sep 09, 2009 23:01
Actually, yes, it is all matter of observation. If you want to judge a person/company etc do not look for whatever is obvious, look for small details and decide whether you like them or not. I, for example, like an elitist and selective cultures, so for me tough barriers to entry is definitely a plus... Some people prefer less traditional and more open environment. It is whatever rocks your boat..
Posted Sep 09, 2009 23:32
Cant really say about any particular college, the perfect example of this is one of my senior and me.
Two years back my senior went to LSE with a Higher Second class in LLB degree and three years of work experience in a law firm whereas I passed my LLB with First Class and worked for 5 years (I also worked in the same law firm for 2 years plus worked in the legal departments of a financial institution)....
This year I applied only to LSE and Kings in the 3rd week of January, I was waitlisted at LSE and finally rejected and got accepted at Kings. Was initially upset but later I realised that Finance Law faculty at Kings is excellent so didnt lose much. Of course, I must admit that LSE has a better brand value in general and is very widely known (perhaps more for its economics)
I always assumed earlier, that when my senior can make it to LSE with higher second class, I would always stand a good chance with my credentials....So the moral of the story is that one must apply early and nothing can be said about any college.
Also dont forget this year it was more difficult to get in any good college coz the competition was very high. Most of the universities in US and UK received a record high application...thanks to the Recession!!!!
Two years back my senior went to LSE with a Higher Second class in LLB degree and three years of work experience in a law firm whereas I passed my LLB with First Class and worked for 5 years (I also worked in the same law firm for 2 years plus worked in the legal departments of a financial institution)....
This year I applied only to LSE and Kings in the 3rd week of January, I was waitlisted at LSE and finally rejected and got accepted at Kings. Was initially upset but later I realised that Finance Law faculty at Kings is excellent so didnt lose much. Of course, I must admit that LSE has a better brand value in general and is very widely known (perhaps more for its economics)
I always assumed earlier, that when my senior can make it to LSE with higher second class, I would always stand a good chance with my credentials....So the moral of the story is that one must apply early and nothing can be said about any college.
Also dont forget this year it was more difficult to get in any good college coz the competition was very high. Most of the universities in US and UK received a record high application...thanks to the Recession!!!!
Posted Sep 10, 2009 00:59
catseye: just to confirm you view on KCL finance law department, I was accepted to LSE and KCL but opted for the latter after some serious research concerning the teachers and the courses.
Posted Sep 10, 2009 03:13
Thanks you guys' comments, it's so informative, it seems that my chance in LSE is quite desparate. anyway, I will give a try.
thanks.
thanks.
Posted Sep 10, 2009 07:07
Do not worry, Catseye...You fell victim of the desire of thge LSE to concentrate more on the UK and EU market...Remember I mentioned this in the past for a couple of unis and some members of the website accused me of things....The timing of your application made little difference because there is a tendency to reject earlier applicants thinking that the later ones would be better. The LLM programme stayed opened for quite a while. KCL (after all negative publicity) has made an effort to broaden its intake. I studied at the LSE and can say that KCL can easilly be perceived as a better brand for law. KCL is known for law and medicine, that's why you go their for...One would go to the LSE for economics, finance and related fields, politics and international relations. I do nit think they see law as a core competency. By the way, why did not you apply to Oxbridge-I think you would have a good chance...
Posted Sep 10, 2009 07:09
Sorry for spelling errors guys, difficut to type on balckberry
Posted Sep 10, 2009 09:03
Whether an accurate reflection of reality or not,I think it would be fair to say that internationally at least, LSE's brand name and reputation, including for law, comes behind only Oxbridge. In my own experience it is also harder to get into LSE. The students with 2 1s in my class went to Kings, those with 1sts more to LSE. However I think it really all depends on what one is studying-different unis are better in different areas of law. Both, along with UCL, are excellent law schools.
Posted Sep 10, 2009 12:59
Actually, yes, it is all matter of observation. If you want to judge a person/company etc do not look for whatever is obvious, look for small details and decide whether you like them or not. I, for example, like an elitist and selective cultures, so for me tough barriers to entry is definitely a plus... Some people prefer less traditional and more open environment. It is whatever rocks your boat..
I would just caution people on assuming that the Postgraduate admissions practices/guidelines/staff/traditions are the same in a univ/college's medical faculty as compared to a univ/college's law school (or, for that matter, their history department or psychology dept). From my time working in universities, I can say that they will usually be different staff, looking for different things, and prioritising different aspects of a person's application.
Insider knowledge about "elitism" and "selectivity" is only useful if it relates to the decision being made. Otherwise it's guff.
I would just caution people on assuming that the Postgraduate admissions practices/guidelines/staff/traditions are the same in a univ/college's medical faculty as compared to a univ/college's law school (or, for that matter, their history department or psychology dept). From my time working in universities, I can say that they will usually be different staff, looking for different things, and prioritising different aspects of a person's application.
Insider knowledge about "elitism" and "selectivity" is only useful if it relates to the decision being made. Otherwise it's guff.
Posted Sep 11, 2009 17:36
King's among world top 10 Kings School of Law has been ranked seventh in the world for its LLM programmes by Spanish employment magazine Expansión & Empleo and the legal pages of its website Expansion.com. The publications conducted a survey among the top Spanish law firms to find out where to train their best professionals. The ranking also took into account various international classifications such as the ones done by The Financial Times, US News, The Guardian and The Times as well as the one edited by Brian Leiter, professor at the University of Chicago and Director of the Centre of Law, Philosophy and Human Values. Among the top ten law schools are six from the United States, three from the UK and one from Belgium. The other two institutions to appear in the top ten alongside Kings are the London School of Economics and University College London.
Posted Sep 28, 2009 20:58
UCL is harder to get into than kings. UCL requires a good 2:1, so a bare 2:1 can be (and is often) rejected. It depends also on references/work/publications etc.. Kings is a 2:1/2:2 borderline entry. There are plenty of 2:2 degrees doing the LLM at KIngs, but it is still an excellent school.
In London, all the former University of London colleges have merit, but there is a ranking with UCL and the LSE very much at the top. Both UCL and the LSE consider that they compete with Oxbridge, rather than other London colleges, in terms of candidates for entry, their requirements and reputation/research rank etc. Whether this is borne out in reality may be debatable, but this is the position they take if you talk to admissions tutors and faculty.
In London, all the former University of London colleges have merit, but there is a ranking with UCL and the LSE very much at the top. Both UCL and the LSE consider that they compete with Oxbridge, rather than other London colleges, in terms of candidates for entry, their requirements and reputation/research rank etc. Whether this is borne out in reality may be debatable, but this is the position they take if you talk to admissions tutors and faculty.
Posted Sep 29, 2009 01:30
UCL is probably better is international public law and legal theory and jurisprudence. KCL is better for finance law and competition law. Check the teachers and modules ......For the remaining specializations, both institutions are similar but UCL has a slightly better reputation in the UK while KCL has an edge is central Europe and Asia. LSE is obviously excellent but overrated for law (very reputable in the Americas) .
Posted Sep 29, 2009 23:08
I think CR1's assessment is fairly accurate.
Posted Sep 29, 2009 23:48
I would say that the last assessment is accurate as well. The specialization really matters and the partners in the UK firms know it. The majority would name UCL for PIL and legal theory and jurisprudence and perhaps commercial banking but KCL is normally the better choice among the 3 London schools for International Finance and Competition. LSE is strong in most of the fields but except in the Americas, its reputation is on par with UCL and KCL
Related Law Schools
Hot Discussions
-
Cambridge LL.M. Applicants 2024-2025
Oct 30, 2024 142,285 544 -
Georgetown LLM 2024/2025 applicants
Nov 16 09:22 PM 40,090 209 -
Oxford 2025-2026 BCL/MSCs/MJUR/MPHIL/MLF
Nov 15 04:43 AM 2,037 44 -
NUS LLM 2024-25 Cohort
Oct 25, 2024 5,856 34 -
MIDS - 2024-25
Nov 15 12:52 AM 1,837 16 -
Warwick or Birmingham
Nov 10, 2024 1,162 5 -
NUS LLM cohort 2025/26
Nov 17 05:40 PM 470 5 -
EU citizen barred in the US -- will an LLM from an EU school help me practice law somewhere in the EU?
Nov 15 12:58 AM 137 4