Does anyone know what kind of evaluation they will give? I have heard that some get "superior", and some get "above average"....is there any other kind of evaluation?

Sigh....no one want to answer this question..?

Perhaps no one answers because no one knows ?! I decided not to use LSAC as their report was crap. Just look at the several posts relating to LSAC.

Regards

Perhaps you arent getting answers because people kind of get tired having to repeat themselves not once, or twice but over and over. You need to experience it to understand. I've heard that the sensation could be liken to a broken record that gets stuck in a groove, or a CD track skipping endlessly, other's have described the feeling, as chalk running down a chalk board.......

However spinning off what Yps said, Id also recommend going over to xoxohth.com. You'd get answers, but be prepared for some negative comments that comes with anonymous forums.

You basically have to have the ability to sift thru a lot crap to get your answer(s). But then that's part of the charm & allure of these sites. Best of Luck!

Start here: http://www.llm-guide.com/board/7631 or go directly to the board search. There are 20 threads about "LSAC". Hope this helps...

Just to be fair... Could you please pinpoint exactly which one of these twenty threads speaks of any evaluation apart from "superior" and "above avarage"? I think you're gonna have a difficulty with that...
But going back to the original question. ucbla, I think the reason there is no answer is because most people at the forum get one of the mentioned evaluations. Either that, or those who get a less favorable evaluation just don't want to admit it.
Good luck to all

Actually I don't know as I did not read all of them. I concluded from bardivas post that the original question has been answered in this board before. Maybe bardiva knows more about this?

Out of the 3655 registered users why am I the one put on the spot? (Smiles). Rhetorical Question I usually try to stay away from online drama as much as possiblebut Im yet to see admin or the original poster complain. And yes, the context of that question has been answered before on this board. If memory serve me correctly, I took part in one of such debates. I believe those posts urged to be pulled up. But one thing that is certain, as certain as the morning sun is that Im not going to do it. For me to go ahead and pull up those posts, would not only defeat my initial stance (On a good day Im quite flexible) but will also go to show to a large degree something definitely lacking. Id have to figure that out later, but I have a feeling, itd have to do with my reasoning ability.

Anyone who has read any of my previous entries would note that majority of the time I tend to provide links etc, theres an obvious reason why I tend to do that. (For whatever its worth). One, I dont want to be quoted wrongly. Two, I dont want anyone to rely on wrong information to his or her detriment. Three, I dont want to give the impression, Im on a high horse and kidda know-it-all

Dont take anything personal and I dont expect anyone to, but with bar exams just round the cornerumm (cough cough) this is Bardiva signing out of the building. (And dont worry Id be really careful, I wouldnt let the door hit me on my out). Peace Out. 11/24/2005

Forgive me if I got this wrong but is Bar Diva suggesting that before anyone gets to post any question on this site, such individual must first trawl through the mountain of previous posts to ascertain that the question has never been asked or an answer previously provided? hmmm....

David,
You re right. That is exactly what the self styled Bar Quenn (soory Diva!) is saying.
By the way Diva, best of luck in your Bar exams!