In postings concerning top US law schools diverse professors are recurringly referred to as prominent in their field of legal research. As regards my impression concerning UK law schools this is not as often the case. Aren't UK scholars, say at Oxbridge or elsewhere, as outstanding as their American colleagues? Or is there just not a comparable personality cult in the UK?
Who are the most eminent scholars, regardless of their specific field of specialization, at Oxford?
Most prominent scholars in Oxford
Posted Mar 21, 2008 00:27
Who are the most eminent scholars, regardless of their specific field of specialization, at Oxford?
Posted Mar 21, 2008 07:17
uk scholars are great - but uk unis don't have the whole system of 'academic stars' and publicised aggressive hiring practices!
at oxford for jurisprudence - finnis and endicott
dont know about other fields..
at oxford for jurisprudence - finnis and endicott
dont know about other fields..
Posted Mar 21, 2008 09:43
here here.
It almost seems as if in the U.S. Universities/Law Schools have to market themselves a lot more aggressively than in the UK. This leads me to the impression that the threshold of 'academic stardom' or 'prominence' is quite a bit lower than the sites and brochures make out. I'm not trying to belittle any american scholars (many of whom I hold in the highest regard), I simply think its quite a big cultural difference, even within the common law legal family.
Of scholars in Oxford, Professor Vaughan Lowe in Public International Law comes to mind (my own area of interest), who is regarded as one of the most prominent experts on the law of Jurisdiction, as well as a frequent advocate before the ICJ. Obviously his predecessor Professor Brownlie is quite a highly regarded name in PIL as well.
Also, the whole Jurisprudence section (and particularly considering their connection to the UCL 'jurisprudes') is very impressive.
It almost seems as if in the U.S. Universities/Law Schools have to market themselves a lot more aggressively than in the UK. This leads me to the impression that the threshold of 'academic stardom' or 'prominence' is quite a bit lower than the sites and brochures make out. I'm not trying to belittle any american scholars (many of whom I hold in the highest regard), I simply think its quite a big cultural difference, even within the common law legal family.
Of scholars in Oxford, Professor Vaughan Lowe in Public International Law comes to mind (my own area of interest), who is regarded as one of the most prominent experts on the law of Jurisdiction, as well as a frequent advocate before the ICJ. Obviously his predecessor Professor Brownlie is quite a highly regarded name in PIL as well.
Also, the whole Jurisprudence section (and particularly considering their connection to the UCL 'jurisprudes') is very impressive.
Posted Mar 21, 2008 14:45
This is a great thread. Pkotiaho, who would you say has the highest profile at Oxford among the legal historians? They have a lot of depth in this area, but I don't know who among the scholars is prominent.
Posted Mar 23, 2008 17:02
Dear cognos,
I'm sorry to say that when it comes to what many might regard as legal history 'proper' I'm slightly out of my depth.
Also my personal understanding of the differentiation between legal history as opposed to legal theory/philosophy or jurisprudence (apart from that which many adherents call "analytical" jurisprudence) is that it might have something more to do with the academic job market than actually a different sub-field altogether.
However, that aside, having had a quick glance at the legal history subfield at Oxford (www.law.ox.ac.uk) I can't say that I am any the wiser. Sorry I can't be of more help.
best,
paavo
I'm sorry to say that when it comes to what many might regard as legal history 'proper' I'm slightly out of my depth.
Also my personal understanding of the differentiation between legal history as opposed to legal theory/philosophy or jurisprudence (apart from that which many adherents call "analytical" jurisprudence) is that it might have something more to do with the academic job market than actually a different sub-field altogether.
However, that aside, having had a quick glance at the legal history subfield at Oxford (www.law.ox.ac.uk) I can't say that I am any the wiser. Sorry I can't be of more help.
best,
paavo
Posted Mar 23, 2008 21:26
Legal:
Andrew Ashworth surely???!?
The only area in the UK I would say that academics have become 'stars' is in History, where academics are used most frequently to present series of documentaries on TV, hence gaining public exposure. Most people in the UK have consequently now heard of Richard Holmes, David Starkey, Simon Sharma, Niall Ferguson etc. A number of these have now actually gone to U.S. universities I believe..........
Andrew Ashworth surely???!?
The only area in the UK I would say that academics have become 'stars' is in History, where academics are used most frequently to present series of documentaries on TV, hence gaining public exposure. Most people in the UK have consequently now heard of Richard Holmes, David Starkey, Simon Sharma, Niall Ferguson etc. A number of these have now actually gone to U.S. universities I believe..........
Related Law Schools
Hot Discussions
-
Cambridge LL.M. Applicants 2024-2025
Oct 30, 2024 141,941 544 -
Stanford 2024-2025
Nov 07, 2024 35,018 117 -
Oxford 2025-2026 BCL/MSCs/MJUR/MPHIL/MLF
Nov 15 04:43 AM 1,916 44 -
NUS LLM 2024-25 Cohort
Oct 25, 2024 5,845 34 -
I got accepted bu for the Dresten üni LLM in IP LAW
Oct 20, 2024 722 8 -
LL.M. Scholarship Rates?
Nov 09, 2024 2,485 5 -
Scholarship Negotiation Strategy (BCL v. NYU LLM Dean's Graduate Scholarship)
Nov 09, 2024 1,014 4 -
EU citizen barred in the US -- will an LLM from an EU school help me practice law somewhere in the EU?
Nov 15 12:58 AM 129 4