Just got an offer from King's for 2008.

How would King's compare to UCL and LSE?

Thanks

How the three colleges compare depends on what you're planning to study, and also where you plan to work/study in the future.

For some reason, LSE has the best rep. in N. America, but KCL, has the best rep in continental Europe, and then UCL has the best rep in the UK.

LSE is v. modern in comparison to UCL and KCL in terms of building quality etc. With LSE, everything is near to hand, and it also offers better quality student accommodation.
UCL and KCL have a very old British educational feel to them. KCL is more grander in terms of buildings - though the law school is in a terrible state.

I find LSE has the least impressive faculty staff out of the three, and in terms of teaching, I found KCL and UCL to be the best, while LSE was v. poor - but again it depends on what modules you take.

I forgot to add - fees obviously play a huge part. Personally, I do not feel LSE is worth the extra money in comparison to KCL and UCL.

My biggest issue would be accomodation and student life because, all are really world class.

My goal was to get into any of the big 3 london schools.