It seems that Prof Ravi Tennekoon and Prof Jan Dalhuisen run competing course modules within KCL on International Financial Services:
- International Finance I;
- International Finace III (half module)
v
- Financial Services and Principles of Financial Regulation
- Legal Aspects of the operation of international Capital Markets (Bonds, Equities, Derivatives) (full module?)
Does anybody have a preference; know which one students prefer to be taught by; know which course tends to produce better grades; if either is better regarded professionally; whether Jan's courses have more of a UK domestic element than Ravi's; which one does more on derivative securitisations?
Then there's the other modules they both teach:
Ravi's - Int Finance II (project finance) (half module)
Jan's - Financial Regulation in US+Europe (full module?)
- Analytical and Quant Method (full module?)
Are they, in practice, expected to be also taken if you undertake their core courses???
Can anyone clarify any of this jumble? Thanks
KCL Modules
Posted Jun 25, 2008 12:55
It seems that Prof Ravi Tennekoon and Prof Jan Dalhuisen run competing course modules within KCL on International Financial Services:
- International Finance I;
- International Finace III (half module)
v
- Financial Services and Principles of Financial Regulation
- Legal Aspects of the operation of international Capital Markets (Bonds, Equities, Derivatives) (full module?)
Does anybody have a preference; know which one students prefer to be taught by; know which course tends to produce better grades; if either is better regarded professionally; whether Jan's courses have more of a UK domestic element than Ravi's; which one does more on derivative securitisations?
Then there's the other modules they both teach:
Ravi's - Int Finance II (project finance) (half module)
Jan's - Financial Regulation in US+Europe (full module?)
- Analytical and Quant Method (full module?)
Are they, in practice, expected to be also taken if you undertake their core courses???
Can anyone clarify any of this jumble? Thanks
- International Finance I;
- International Finace III (half module)
v
- Financial Services and Principles of Financial Regulation
- Legal Aspects of the operation of international Capital Markets (Bonds, Equities, Derivatives) (full module?)
Does anybody have a preference; know which one students prefer to be taught by; know which course tends to produce better grades; if either is better regarded professionally; whether Jan's courses have more of a UK domestic element than Ravi's; which one does more on derivative securitisations?
Then there's the other modules they both teach:
Ravi's - Int Finance II (project finance) (half module)
Jan's - Financial Regulation in US+Europe (full module?)
- Analytical and Quant Method (full module?)
Are they, in practice, expected to be also taken if you undertake their core courses???
Can anyone clarify any of this jumble? Thanks
Related Law Schools
Full Profile
London, United Kingdom
833 Followers
954 Discussions
Hot Discussions
-
Cambridge LL.M. Applicants 2024-2025
Oct 30, 2024 141,872 544 -
MIDS - 2024-25
Nov 15 12:52 AM 1,824 16 -
I got accepted bu for the Dresten üni LLM in IP LAW
Oct 20, 2024 721 8 -
Harvard LLM 2025-2026
Nov 12 07:52 PM 1,513 5 -
NUS LLM cohort 2025/26
Nov 03, 2024 401 4 -
Scholarship Negotiation Strategy (BCL v. NYU LLM Dean's Graduate Scholarship)
Nov 09, 2024 1,007 4 -
EU citizen barred in the US -- will an LLM from an EU school help me practice law somewhere in the EU?
Nov 15 12:58 AM 115 4 -
NUS vs Peking
Nov 09, 2024 172 4