So, I have been looking at the LSE international law programme a lot recently and I have been getting more frustrated by the minute. Why separate international business and public law? I understand the distinction between the two--one is entirely related to commerce and the other to sovereignty and citizenries--however, I don't see why the two cannot culminate in a study deemed "International Law" or "International Commerce, Market, and Public Law." Naturally, when you study international law, you're studying both the individual, the institutions (nations, governs, etc), and the commerce between nations. Why not allow a study of this sort with the others? I am heart-set on LSE, but it's tearing my heart apart. I can't distinguish business law from public law or vica versa in my passions. Advice?
International Business vs Public Law--FRUSTRATION
Posted May 04, 2009 09:12
Posted May 04, 2009 12:08
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure you can take any combination of subjects you want. So if you want to mix public law modules with international business modules, its your prerogative, I'm pretty sure LSE won't stop you. The worst that can happen is that your LLM scroll won't have a specialization title like LLM in international business law or something, but I don't think that's anything to lose sleep about. Lots of Schools grant general LLMs including Cambridge and Oxford.
Related Law Schools
Hot Discussions
-
Cambridge LL.M. Applicants 2024-2025
Oct 30 11:56 AM 141,190 544 -
Stanford 2024-2025
15 hours ago 34,739 116 -
Oxford 2025-2026 BCL/MSCs/MJUR/MPHIL/MLF
Nov 04 05:13 PM 1,318 26 -
I got accepted bu for the Dresten üni LLM in IP LAW
Oct 20, 2024 694 8 -
LLM Technology law Germany in English lang.
Oct 21, 2024 796 5 -
LLM in ADR
Oct 23, 2024 345 4 -
Binding financial obligations
Oct 22, 2024 86 2 -
Harvard LLM Personal Statement Part A
Oct 27, 2024 3,911 2