Hi,
I just finished my JD in the US. I am interested in pursuing International Public Law. I have been admitted to four programs in the UK. Can you please help me decide which one would be best: King's College, SOAS, UCL, and Queen Mary? I have to decide pretty soon, so any advice would be helpful! Thanks.
help deciding btw LLMs in London
Posted Jul 24, 2005 22:49
I just finished my JD in the US. I am interested in pursuing International Public Law. I have been admitted to four programs in the UK. Can you please help me decide which one would be best: King's College, SOAS, UCL, and Queen Mary? I have to decide pretty soon, so any advice would be helpful! Thanks.
Posted Jul 25, 2005 00:51
I don't know much about Public International Law (other than that Cambridge is the best in the UK) but I would say that UCL has a clear lead over King's, which in turn is better than SOAS and Queen Mary.
Posted Jul 25, 2005 15:28
UCL by far has the better reputation. Although QM is seen as one of the weaker of the intercollegiate institutions it has come on leaps and bounds in the past decade and has substantial cash to continue this.
Posted Jul 28, 2005 08:55
UCL , without a doubt.
Posted Aug 01, 2005 14:29
According to the Guardian Good University Guide, KCL law school is the best law school after Oxford, LSE and Cambridge.
Posted Aug 01, 2005 16:29
Hi guys, the rankings are driving me crazy! How does one really go about chosing the right school in the UK? How does one really tell objectively which offer to chose from if you have admission to the LL.M of both the University of Nottingham and the University College London? I ask because even though UCL has got pedigree and is highly rated because of its past, recent surveys tend to indicate that the LLM at Nottingham is more highly rated than the LLM in UCL!!! Guys, please lemme have your views! UCL Vs. Nottinham, which is better for the LL.M. Thanks in advance for your objective and candid views!
Posted Aug 02, 2005 09:42
Hello!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone there? Please I need advice fast! LLM Nottingham or LLM UCL, which is the better way to go and why?
Posted Aug 02, 2005 12:09
Don't know if it is helpful, but you have to decide between a great interesting city and a "small" students town. I think studying in London is the better choice. Regarding the quality of study or faculty, there might be little differences, but that should not make the difference when it comes to job search. If you like the more personal touch Nottingham could be the better place for you to go. In summary, I personallly would prefer studying at UCL. Great city (altough quite dangerous these days), good reputation. If money counts a lot, Nottingham is going to be cheaper, especially rents are cheaper than in London.
Good luck
Good luck
Posted Feb 09, 2006 00:20
Talking about Cambridge town, went there years back and got bored after just half an hour...unlike Oxford which is a beautiful city, I found Cambridge town boring and dull..nothing really to see there. So if you just want to study and do nothing else, maybe Cambridge otherwise choose a LL.M in London
Posted Feb 13, 2006 19:57
UCL by far is better than Nottingham in terms of reputation.
Related Law Schools
Hot Discussions
-
Cambridge LL.M. Applicants 2024-2025
Oct 30, 2024 141,741 544 -
Stanford 2024-2025
Nov 07, 2024 34,992 117 -
NUS LLM 2024-25 Cohort
Oct 25, 2024 5,830 34 -
I got accepted bu for the Dresten üni LLM in IP LAW
Oct 20, 2024 718 8 -
Indian Tribes as US Jurisdictions of law attorney admission?
Nov 08 08:47 PM 757 6 -
Harvard LLM 2025-2026
Nov 12 07:52 PM 1,466 5 -
NUS vs Peking
Nov 09 05:19 PM 165 4 -
LLM in ADR
Oct 23, 2024 377 4