Hi,

I'm a belgian who got an offer to start the LLM banking and financial law programme from QMUL and from BRISTOL. And I do believe that those universities are compatible with my level as a student.

But after reading all the different opinions of both law schools, I got confused about the quality of both programmes. I would like a more clear answer to the question if QMUL or BRISTOL are known for there financial law department? More in this line of questiong, I wonder if it would be
seen as an achievement to study an llm at one of these universities.

When one sets aside that of course there are better schools to study an llm, I'm confused how I should rank both universities? And whether or not I'm forgetting obvious universities that are similar to QMUL or BRISTOL, but have a better reputation for financial or banking law?

Thanks in advance.

Bristol is very highly regarded as a university and law school. They have very good facilities and I have heard they have a top quality and rigorous LLM program.

In terms of university reputation, Bristol is far more prestigious and internationally very highly regarded.

QMUL is also a good university, and while it's law department is good, Bristol is superior.

[quote]Bristol is very highly regarded as a university and law school. They have very good facilities and I have heard they have a top quality and rigorous LLM program.

In terms of university reputation, Bristol is far more prestigious and internationally very highly regarded.

QMUL is also a good university, and while it's law department is good, Bristol is superior.[/quote]

Thanks for the advice. Is Bristol also considered to be better to study financial law though? And where do you find any information about this?