Amongst the courses I am taking are Secured Transactions and Legal Aspects of International Law.
...sorry, that should read - Secured Transactions and Legal aspects of International Finance.
Best LLM Programs in London
Posted Jan 16, 2006 22:39
...sorry, that should read - Secured Transactions and Legal aspects of International Finance.
Posted Jan 17, 2006 12:39
Hi James,
thanks a lot for your advice.
My Norwegian degree is recognized as a Master-degree (it's actually higher than a master), it's just that they had not adapted the BA - master system yet when I finished in 2004 (now you may obtain a masters degree in law after five years of studying, and as I said I did six years, including a 20,000 word thesis). Therefore I think I`m formally qualified for a PhD.
The reason why I still want to do an LLM is that I want to specialize on IP, and have a degree from abroad on this subject. I would also like to improve my chances of getting a good job abroad. Are holders of PhDs in the UK attractive on the job-market (as in house lawyers or in law firms) or are they more considered theroretics (working with research, teaching etc.)?
thanks a lot for your advice.
My Norwegian degree is recognized as a Master-degree (it's actually higher than a master), it's just that they had not adapted the BA - master system yet when I finished in 2004 (now you may obtain a masters degree in law after five years of studying, and as I said I did six years, including a 20,000 word thesis). Therefore I think I`m formally qualified for a PhD.
The reason why I still want to do an LLM is that I want to specialize on IP, and have a degree from abroad on this subject. I would also like to improve my chances of getting a good job abroad. Are holders of PhDs in the UK attractive on the job-market (as in house lawyers or in law firms) or are they more considered theroretics (working with research, teaching etc.)?
Posted Jan 17, 2006 19:53
Hey Norwegian,
I don't know much about the virtues of possessing a Ph.D., but one would suspect that they are more revered in the academic community than in the legal profession. A PhD, after all, is a research degree and not a practical qualification like the BVC or LPC. I doubt therefore whether it would SIGNIFICANTLY increase your chances of being employed by a reputable law firm (although I could be wrong). I say significantly because I am not suggesting a PhD would hinder your chances of employment, only that it would be more useful if you were applying for a job as a university lecturer. None of the solicitors at the law firm I work part-time at - including the partners - possess PhDs.
Good luck,
James
I don't know much about the virtues of possessing a Ph.D., but one would suspect that they are more revered in the academic community than in the legal profession. A PhD, after all, is a research degree and not a practical qualification like the BVC or LPC. I doubt therefore whether it would SIGNIFICANTLY increase your chances of being employed by a reputable law firm (although I could be wrong). I say significantly because I am not suggesting a PhD would hinder your chances of employment, only that it would be more useful if you were applying for a job as a university lecturer. None of the solicitors at the law firm I work part-time at - including the partners - possess PhDs.
Good luck,
James
Posted Jan 19, 2006 18:24
Is there a common understanding that one of the to rankings, Times and Guardian, is more regarded than the other one? There are some differences between the two. It would be nice to know which to relay on.
Posted Jan 19, 2006 18:40
In the UK - the Times league table for law carries with it the most weight.
Hope this helps,
James
Hope this helps,
James
Posted Jan 19, 2006 18:57
Thank you James. It made it a bit easier for me to decide. I'm going to apply for an LLM in London for 2007/2008. I'm thinking of KCL, UCL and LSE, but it's hard to decide which is the first choice. But of course, if I am denied admission for one or two if them, it would make my choice much easier... Which of them is the most difficult to get in to? I am under the impression that LSE is the hardest. Is that true?
OKM
OKM
Posted Mar 07, 2006 01:43
The preoccupation with 'top schools' and the pointless comparisons with mangoes and apples is a recipe for disaster. While I understand the age -old reputation of 'oxbridge' and 'london' and their US ivy league equivalents, it is important to remember three things:
1. Having graduated you WILL have to prove yourself...and so wherever you graduated from becomes less important as you go on
2. Universities are not meant to be carbon copies of each other. These comparisons are therefore pointless. Queen Mary has a different focus in its devotion to legal scholarship, not found at UCL or LSE and vice versa. Ultimately you all end up with the same degree ( from the University of London ). In short, follow the expertise whereever it is. And in doing that get the best grades you can and network until they day you leave! These will count for much much more than attending as a misfit for the sake of something that in the long run will not really make a difference.
3. Top tier is not what will make you into the brightest thing ever, or the best lawyer to walk the earth. The domination of Oxbridge/London on the Bench for example is an accident of history. In 10-20 years time it will be comprehensively diversified. Brilliance comes well prior to attending any university and will shine virtually anywhere.
1. Having graduated you WILL have to prove yourself...and so wherever you graduated from becomes less important as you go on
2. Universities are not meant to be carbon copies of each other. These comparisons are therefore pointless. Queen Mary has a different focus in its devotion to legal scholarship, not found at UCL or LSE and vice versa. Ultimately you all end up with the same degree ( from the University of London ). In short, follow the expertise whereever it is. And in doing that get the best grades you can and network until they day you leave! These will count for much much more than attending as a misfit for the sake of something that in the long run will not really make a difference.
3. Top tier is not what will make you into the brightest thing ever, or the best lawyer to walk the earth. The domination of Oxbridge/London on the Bench for example is an accident of history. In 10-20 years time it will be comprehensively diversified. Brilliance comes well prior to attending any university and will shine virtually anywhere.
Posted Mar 07, 2006 16:20
Factual Inaccuracies on this thread
I have spotted two factual inaccuracies in this thread
1. it is not true that you need a LLM to do a PhD. It is often the case that PhD students have LLMs but that is not necessarily the case-but most British University Law Schools will take a student either from practice; direct from a LLB or from a foreign first degree.
2. The Times listing does not have much more special weight than the Guardian. My understanding is that they are measuring different things-I would check what they are measuring in making any assessment of a school's position in any list.
And more generally on PhDs in practice-they are not uncommon-but they exist in some areas-eg in my area-competition law, where the law is very complex and there is very little difference between practical and theoretical approaches quite a few practitioners have PhD's.
Dr. Alan Riley
Director of LLM Programmes
City Law School
I have spotted two factual inaccuracies in this thread
1. it is not true that you need a LLM to do a PhD. It is often the case that PhD students have LLMs but that is not necessarily the case-but most British University Law Schools will take a student either from practice; direct from a LLB or from a foreign first degree.
2. The Times listing does not have much more special weight than the Guardian. My understanding is that they are measuring different things-I would check what they are measuring in making any assessment of a school's position in any list.
And more generally on PhDs in practice-they are not uncommon-but they exist in some areas-eg in my area-competition law, where the law is very complex and there is very little difference between practical and theoretical approaches quite a few practitioners have PhD's.
Dr. Alan Riley
Director of LLM Programmes
City Law School
Posted Mar 08, 2006 10:41
I would like to disagree with the comment about the times not having more weight that the Guardian ranks. I have said before that the Guardian has ranked Bradford as 10th in law and yet Bradford does not have a law faculty! It does not do the law degree!!!! How can they claim to be accurate and give a correct view of the ranks yet they have made such a big mistake! I think the Times ranking is certainly more credible!
Posted Mar 08, 2006 12:21
The point I made is that they measure different things-so it is important to look at what they are measuring.
In fact Bradford does have a Law School
see
http://www.bradfordlaw-school.org.uk/
Dr. Alan Riley
Director LLM Programme
City Law School
Electronic Mail: alan.riley.1@city.ac.uk
In fact Bradford does have a Law School
see
http://www.bradfordlaw-school.org.uk/
Dr. Alan Riley
Director LLM Programme
City Law School
Electronic Mail: alan.riley.1@city.ac.uk
Posted Mar 08, 2006 12:30
Yes...Bradford has a law school, but it is not under University of Bradford which is what the Guardian Ranks claim. It is a school run between Bradford College and Leeds Met. It remains, Bradford University does not have a law degree and this is contrary to what the Guardian Tables claim.
Posted Mar 08, 2006 15:08
The Guardian, like The Times has sub-editors!
and that bit of information clearly got lost.
Identifying that there is a Law School at Bradford is about as far as you can expect any newspaper to go!
A newspaper is not drafted like an Act of Parliament!
I am sure if you had a look down The Times lists you would find similar style and institutional name mistakes on their list as well.
And incidentally there is now a Law School at Bradford University
See
http://www.brad.ac.uk/university/ugpros/law.php
Dr. Alan Riley
Director LLM Programme
City Law School
Electronic Mail: alan.riley.1@city.ac.uk
and that bit of information clearly got lost.
Identifying that there is a Law School at Bradford is about as far as you can expect any newspaper to go!
A newspaper is not drafted like an Act of Parliament!
I am sure if you had a look down The Times lists you would find similar style and institutional name mistakes on their list as well.
And incidentally there is now a Law School at Bradford University
See
http://www.brad.ac.uk/university/ugpros/law.php
Dr. Alan Riley
Director LLM Programme
City Law School
Electronic Mail: alan.riley.1@city.ac.uk
Related Law Schools
Hot Discussions
-
Cambridge LL.M. Applicants 2024-2025
Oct 30, 2024 142,293 544 -
Georgetown LLM 2024/2025 applicants
Nov 16 09:22 PM 40,095 209 -
Oxford 2025-2026 BCL/MSCs/MJUR/MPHIL/MLF
Nov 15 04:43 AM 2,049 44 -
NUS LLM 2024-25 Cohort
Oct 25, 2024 5,857 34 -
Harvard LLM 2025-2026
22 hours ago 1,672 7 -
NUS LLM cohort 2025/26
Nov 17 05:40 PM 471 5 -
LL.M. Scholarship Rates?
Nov 09, 2024 2,503 5 -
LLM in Germany 2024
Nov 09, 2024 822 4