I have applied to LLM programs for Sept. 2010, but I have also made commitments with my employer to take on permanent work starting in Fall 2010. If I get into an LLM program, I will quit my work.
I have some unpublished work for my employer which I mentioned in my CV.
I am worried that the schools might call my employer to verify what I have written about my experience and forthcoming publications. If this occurred, it would be a very embarrassing situation at work, revealing that I have applied to the LLM program and that my job is my second choice. This would potentially affect my future employment negatively.
Is there any chance that a school would call a third party during the evaluation process? I mean, surely, they must verify the information that I have provided in the CV--has anyone heard of this happening?
Will a school call a third party to verify CV?
Posted Dec 12, 2009 19:01
I have some unpublished work for my employer which I mentioned in my CV.
I am worried that the schools might call my employer to verify what I have written about my experience and forthcoming publications. If this occurred, it would be a very embarrassing situation at work, revealing that I have applied to the LLM program and that my job is my second choice. This would potentially affect my future employment negatively.
Is there any chance that a school would call a third party during the evaluation process? I mean, surely, they must verify the information that I have provided in the CV--has anyone heard of this happening?
Posted Dec 13, 2009 01:22
HLS has a very clear Privacy policy where they voluntarily waive any such verification.
Others to my knowledge may not have (explicitly @ any rate), such privacy policies;
Nonetheless, they MAY contact your referres if time permits them and thats about it.
They will not contact any one else simply because that third party may not know you very well and therefore their word is just not trustworthy enough.
Speaking from a L&E perspective, I think the law schools appreciate that "couterparty" behaviour is costly to verify and opportunistic behaviour might happen in few cases; their response, if I may draw on Gary Becker's theory, is to rely on enhanced threat of expost sanction (in terms of revoking the admissions/reputational sanctions etc.,) coupled with ex ante clear "rules" that mandate absolute disclosure and the detailed procedure of sealing and signing across the seal by the recommender that reduces their ex post cost of verification
To come back to your question, They will verify your credentials only from such sources that you have (implicitly) allowed them to verify it from. The recommenders serve that purpose/
Ergo, if your employer reco was provided, they MAY contact the recommender to verify your credentials overall including what you put on your resume.
Others to my knowledge may not have (explicitly @ any rate), such privacy policies;
Nonetheless, they MAY contact your referres if time permits them and thats about it.
They will not contact any one else simply because that third party may not know you very well and therefore their word is just not trustworthy enough.
Speaking from a L&E perspective, I think the law schools appreciate that "couterparty" behaviour is costly to verify and opportunistic behaviour might happen in few cases; their response, if I may draw on Gary Becker's theory, is to rely on enhanced threat of expost sanction (in terms of revoking the admissions/reputational sanctions etc.,) coupled with ex ante clear "rules" that mandate absolute disclosure and the detailed procedure of sealing and signing across the seal by the recommender that reduces their ex post cost of verification
To come back to your question, They will verify your credentials only from such sources that you have (implicitly) allowed them to verify it from. The recommenders serve that purpose/
Ergo, if your employer reco was provided, they MAY contact the recommender to verify your credentials overall including what you put on your resume.
Posted Dec 13, 2009 01:27
Thank you for the response! Drawing on L&E references is encouraged and appreciated!!!
Posted Dec 13, 2009 01:34
you can bet on that dude!... Although going purely by nicknames, you would not be too happy about L&E LOL... (Blackstone was a positivist was he not? I think so; correct me if I am wrong)...LOL...
All the best....
All the best....
Hot Discussions
-
Stanford 2024-2025
Nov 07, 2024 35,002 117 -
MIDS - 2024-25
Nov 15 12:52 AM 1,821 16 -
Indian Tribes as US Jurisdictions of law attorney admission?
Nov 08, 2024 759 6 -
Harvard LLM 2025-2026
Nov 12 07:52 PM 1,489 5 -
LL.M. Scholarship Rates?
Nov 09 05:58 PM 2,476 5 -
NUS LLM cohort 2025/26
Nov 03, 2024 399 4 -
NUS vs Peking
Nov 09 05:19 PM 168 4 -
LLM in ADR
Oct 23, 2024 381 4