As I wrote in another discussion I don't agree. I would say that the Stockholm programme is way better than the Geneva one for a number of reasons:
(i) it is 8-year old, while the MIDS is new and, as such, a question mark;
(ii) it focuses on "international commercial arbitration", while with MIDS you are forced to study remotely-related subjects like International Trade or stuff like that;
(iii) the seriousness of the ICAL derives also from the fact that it is not customizable; you want to learn arbitration? This is it, everyone will get the same level of preparation;
(iv) the professors at Stockholm are exclusively dedicated to commercial arbitration while at MIDS you have about 30 speakers and you don't really know who your reference is;
(v) the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce administers more international commercial arbitration cases than Geneva;
(vi) it will allow you to work part-time during the second semester;
(vii) it will save you about 17,000 EURO!
(viii) it is MUCH more selective, also as a result of (i) and (vii) above;
And so on.
As I wrote in another discussion I don't agree. I would say that the Stockholm programme is way better than the Geneva one for a number of reasons:
(i) it is 8-year old, while the MIDS is new and, as such, a question mark;
(ii) it focuses on "international commercial arbitration", while with MIDS you are forced to study remotely-related subjects like International Trade or stuff like that;
(iii) the seriousness of the ICAL derives also from the fact that it is not customizable; you want to learn arbitration? This is it, everyone will get the same level of preparation;
(iv) the professors at Stockholm are exclusively dedicated to commercial arbitration while at MIDS you have about 30 speakers and you don't really know who your reference is;
(v) the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce administers more international commercial arbitration cases than Geneva;
(vi) it will allow you to work part-time during the second semester;
(vii) it will save you about 17,000 EURO!
(viii) it is MUCH more selective, also as a result of (i) and (vii) above;
And so on.