Hi there,
I've always lived thinking that LL.M.s were something different from the average masters.
Now I see that some people attended a master programme (more specifically a M2 in France) and claim this was an LL.M. while, so far, I always considered these as part of a Master's Degree.
Moreover I always thought that for an LL.M. to be a real one, it takes the official declaration on the university website, saying it's an LLM an not just a simple "Master" title.
I always relied on the definition of LL.M. as a "post-lauream" programme and deducted that this would come after a 4/5 years of education (that's why 3 years of university are not enough to apply for lawyer/judge bar).
I think I am a bit confused here, what do you guys think about it?
Thanks in advance
Clarification over LLM and Master
Posted Dec 13, 2014 22:25
Hi there,
I've always lived thinking that LL.M.s were something different from the average masters.
Now I see that some people attended a master programme (more specifically a M2 in France) and claim this was an LL.M. while, so far, I always considered these as part of a Master's Degree.
Moreover I always thought that for an LL.M. to be a real one, it takes the official declaration on the university website, saying it's an LLM an not just a simple "Master" title.
I always relied on the definition of LL.M. as a "post-lauream" programme and deducted that this would come after a 4/5 years of education (that's why 3 years of university are not enough to apply for lawyer/judge bar).
I think I am a bit confused here, what do you guys think about it?
Thanks in advance
I've always lived thinking that LL.M.s were something different from the average masters.
Now I see that some people attended a master programme (more specifically a M2 in France) and claim this was an LL.M. while, so far, I always considered these as part of a Master's Degree.
Moreover I always thought that for an LL.M. to be a real one, it takes the official declaration on the university website, saying it's an LLM an not just a simple "Master" title.
I always relied on the definition of LL.M. as a "post-lauream" programme and deducted that this would come after a 4/5 years of education (that's why 3 years of university are not enough to apply for lawyer/judge bar).
I think I am a bit confused here, what do you guys think about it?
Thanks in advance
Posted Jan 13, 2015 03:26
An LLM is kind of a masters degree, the Master of Laws. It is a masters degree, the same as an Master of Science or a Master of Arts. For a degree to be an LLM, then it needs to be described on the diploma as a Master of Laws.
An LLM is kind of a masters degree, the Master of Laws. It is a masters degree, the same as an Master of Science or a Master of Arts. For a degree to be an LLM, then it needs to be described on the diploma as a Master of Laws.
Hot Discussions
-
Georgetown LLM 2024/2025 applicants
Nov 16 09:22 PM 40,095 209 -
Stanford 2024-2025
Nov 07, 2024 35,066 117 -
Harvard LLM 2025-2026
22 hours ago 1,672 7 -
Indian Tribes as US Jurisdictions of law attorney admission?
Nov 08, 2024 765 6 -
LL.M. Scholarship Rates?
Nov 09, 2024 2,503 5 -
Scholarship Negotiation Strategy (BCL v. NYU LLM Dean's Graduate Scholarship)
Nov 09, 2024 1,038 4 -
NUS vs Peking
Nov 09, 2024 183 4 -
LLM in ADR
Oct 23, 2024 390 4