Hi All,

So I just wanted to ask a question.

Just let me tell you a bit about myself first: I already have a LLB and am pursuing an LLM (both from a common law country). I am also an admitted solicitor with 2 years practical experience at a top-tier law firm.

The thing is I really want to practice without any restrictions in the US. At the moment I can only practice in NY or California, if I sit the bar exams. To practice without restrictions, I need to do the JD. I am happy to spend the 3 years studying, (probably only 2 because I will get credits). The question I have is can you be "overqualified" for admission to the JD Program? Will the top schools Harvard, Yale, Stanford let in people like me into the JD program?

I have published quite a few articles etc, worked in private practice, been admitted, been on the law review, done quite a lot of pro bono work, good solid grades and awards. But will they look at me and just say no because I already have a law degree (albeit an undergraduate one), and no because I already am a Lawyer?

The thing about the JD also is that I also really want to obtain a detailed and working knowledge of US law. Something that I cannot obtain in the short 9 month LLM period.

Do I have a chance of being admitted to a top JD program? Or should I just try for the LLM? I just know that I would be happier in the longer, more intensive and challenging JD program.

It really depends on how you do on the LSAT. Study hard for that, get a great score and you will be able to get into a great JD program. All that other stuff is just stuff that may factor in if you almost have a great enough score for their program.

A few Law Schools in USA offer transfer from LL.M to JD. You may consider joining LL.M and thereafter transfer to JD.