The ranking game continues...
another list by the Times
1 Cambridge
2 Oxford
3 Durham
4 University College London
5 Manchester
6 London School of Economics
7 Nottingham
8 King's College London
9 Edinburgh
10 Leeds
11 Strathclyde
12 Glasgow
13 Aberdeen
14 Warwick
15 Queens, Belfast
16 Bristol
17 Kent
18 SOAS
19 Queen Mary
20 Newcastle
New Ranking for UK by The Times
Posted May 27, 2005 13:32
0
The ranking game continues...
another list by the Times
1 Cambridge
2 Oxford
3 Durham
4 University College London
5 Manchester
6 London School of Economics
7 Nottingham
8 King's College London
9 Edinburgh
10 Leeds
11 Strathclyde
12 Glasgow
13 Aberdeen
14 Warwick
15 Queens, Belfast
16 Bristol
17 Kent
18 SOAS
19 Queen Mary
20 Newcastle
another list by the Times
1 Cambridge
2 Oxford
3 Durham
4 University College London
5 Manchester
6 London School of Economics
7 Nottingham
8 King's College London
9 Edinburgh
10 Leeds
11 Strathclyde
12 Glasgow
13 Aberdeen
14 Warwick
15 Queens, Belfast
16 Bristol
17 Kent
18 SOAS
19 Queen Mary
20 Newcastle
Posted May 27, 2005 14:26
0
Well, what can I say~~!
the more rankings appear, the higher UCL becomes..and who knows it might in the next ranking jump to 1st place :) just kiddin!
Durham became 3rd, that what is strange about it O_o ahead of LSE?!
anyway, couple of weeks more and all these rankings will become useless..most seats for 05-06 academic year taken, decisions made, applications sent... ^^
anyway, thanks for info!
Well, what can I say~~!
the more rankings appear, the higher UCL becomes..and who knows it might in the next ranking jump to 1st place :) just kiddin!
Durham became 3rd, that what is strange about it O_o ahead of LSE?!
anyway, couple of weeks more and all these rankings will become useless..most seats for 05-06 academic year taken, decisions made, applications sent... ^^
anyway, thanks for info!
the more rankings appear, the higher UCL becomes..and who knows it might in the next ranking jump to 1st place :) just kiddin!
Durham became 3rd, that what is strange about it O_o ahead of LSE?!
anyway, couple of weeks more and all these rankings will become useless..most seats for 05-06 academic year taken, decisions made, applications sent... ^^
anyway, thanks for info!
Posted May 27, 2005 15:26
0
Just some thoughts on rankings...
Durham became 3rd, that what is strange about it O_o ahead of LSE?!
blockquote>
Isn't it interesting that most of us (myself included) have a certain ranking in our minds and think it strange if an actual ranking is different from what we expected? What do we need rankings for then, I wonder? Why shouldn't Durham be better than LSE? How can any of us really tell? I bet most of us haven't attended both universities...
Nevertheless, I wouldn't put too much emphasis on which school is ahead of which within the top ten or so anyway, especially since rankings - it cannot be repeated often enough - are only for undergraduate studies, not for LLM programmes. This becomes perfectly clear when you look at the University of London. Does anybody think a Queen Mary LLM with two courses from UCL is worth less than a UCL LLM with two courses from Queen Mary? Surely not, yet if we took undergraduate rankings seriously for our LLM choices, this would be the conclusion.
Just some thoughts on rankings...
<blockquote>Durham became 3rd, that what is strange about it O_o ahead of LSE?!
blockquote>
Isn't it interesting that most of us (myself included) have a certain ranking in our minds and think it strange if an actual ranking is different from what we expected? What do we need rankings for then, I wonder? Why shouldn't Durham be better than LSE? How can any of us really tell? I bet most of us haven't attended both universities...
Nevertheless, I wouldn't put too much emphasis on which school is ahead of which within the top ten or so anyway, especially since rankings - it cannot be repeated often enough - are only for undergraduate studies, not for LLM programmes. This becomes perfectly clear when you look at the University of London. Does anybody think a Queen Mary LLM with two courses from UCL is worth less than a UCL LLM with two courses from Queen Mary? Surely not, yet if we took undergraduate rankings seriously for our LLM choices, this would be the conclusion.
<blockquote>Durham became 3rd, that what is strange about it O_o ahead of LSE?!
blockquote>
Isn't it interesting that most of us (myself included) have a certain ranking in our minds and think it strange if an actual ranking is different from what we expected? What do we need rankings for then, I wonder? Why shouldn't Durham be better than LSE? How can any of us really tell? I bet most of us haven't attended both universities...
Nevertheless, I wouldn't put too much emphasis on which school is ahead of which within the top ten or so anyway, especially since rankings - it cannot be repeated often enough - are only for undergraduate studies, not for LLM programmes. This becomes perfectly clear when you look at the University of London. Does anybody think a Queen Mary LLM with two courses from UCL is worth less than a UCL LLM with two courses from Queen Mary? Surely not, yet if we took undergraduate rankings seriously for our LLM choices, this would be the conclusion.
Inactive User
Posted May 30, 2005 10:10
0
Well, at least now I am even happier that I ve chosen Manchester!!!
Well, at least now I am even happier that I ve chosen Manchester!!!
Posted May 30, 2005 12:14
0
The ranking seems to be ok. Except that UCL should be above durham and lse and kcl above manchester
The ranking seems to be ok. Except that UCL should be above durham and lse and kcl above manchester
Posted May 30, 2005 15:12
0
The ranking seems to be ok. Except that UCL should be above durham and lse and kcl above manchester
That is a very interesting remark Anabell. Could you share the secret knowledge you appear to have with us?
<blockquote>The ranking seems to be ok. Except that UCL should be above durham and lse and kcl above manchester</blockquote>
That is a very interesting remark Anabell. Could you share the secret knowledge you appear to have with us?
That is a very interesting remark Anabell. Could you share the secret knowledge you appear to have with us?
Posted May 30, 2005 20:31
0
Gregory, where did you find this ranking? Is it already available on the internet?
Gregory, where did you find this ranking? Is it already available on the internet?
Posted May 31, 2005 09:32
0
Yes, it is.
Go to the web-page of The Times www.timesonline.co.uk and then to the Student menu point. There you find the new university league table. They put it up last Friday.
Cheers,
Gregory
Yes, it is.
Go to the web-page of The Times www.timesonline.co.uk and then to the Student menu point. There you find the new university league table. They put it up last Friday.
Cheers,
Gregory
Go to the web-page of The Times www.timesonline.co.uk and then to the Student menu point. There you find the new university league table. They put it up last Friday.
Cheers,
Gregory
Hot Discussions
-
Stanford 2024-2025
Nov 07, 2024 35,068 117 -
Harvard LLM 2025-2026
Nov 20 09:34 PM 1,688 7 -
Warwick or Birmingham
Nov 10, 2024 1,163 5 -
NUS LLM cohort 2025/26
Nov 17 05:40 PM 472 5 -
LL.M. Scholarship Rates?
Nov 09, 2024 2,503 5 -
EU citizen barred in the US -- will an LLM from an EU school help me practice law somewhere in the EU?
Nov 15 12:58 AM 137 4 -
NUS vs Peking
Nov 09, 2024 183 4 -
LLM in ADR
Oct 23, 2024 390 4
