well I see everyone agrees with your opinion....:) so you must be right
KCL or UCL
Posted Feb 10, 2009 21:09
0
well I see everyone agrees with your opinion....:) so you must be right
Posted Feb 10, 2009 21:21
0
I see..
I do consider that in terms of reputation oxbridge is ahead.
well, as you seem to know by close the peculiarities of UK unis, if you have the time to comment on this thread http://www.llm-guide.com/board/57816 I would highly appreciate.
I see..
I do consider that in terms of reputation oxbridge is ahead.
well, as you seem to know by close the peculiarities of UK unis, if you have the time to comment on this thread http://www.llm-guide.com/board/57816 I would highly appreciate.
I do consider that in terms of reputation oxbridge is ahead.
well, as you seem to know by close the peculiarities of UK unis, if you have the time to comment on this thread http://www.llm-guide.com/board/57816 I would highly appreciate.
Posted Feb 10, 2009 21:38
0
well, somethings are common knowledge, pity it seems to have surpassed you
well, somethings are common knowledge, pity it seems to have surpassed you
Posted Feb 10, 2009 21:41
0
well, as you seem to know by close the peculiarities of UK unis, if you have the time to comment on this thread http://www.llm-guide.com/board/57816 I would highly
I am not too familar with the university in Geneva, however as far as I recall their entry requirements are rather high, possible on par with Oxbridge, though don't take my word for it. Cambridge would most likely be the best place to undertake public international law in my mind
well, as you seem to know by close the peculiarities of UK unis, if you have the time to comment on this thread http://www.llm-guide.com/board/57816 I would highly
I am not too familar with the university in Geneva, however as far as I recall their entry requirements are rather high, possible on par with Oxbridge, though don't take my word for it. Cambridge would most likely be the best place to undertake public international law in my mind
I am not too familar with the university in Geneva, however as far as I recall their entry requirements are rather high, possible on par with Oxbridge, though don't take my word for it. Cambridge would most likely be the best place to undertake public international law in my mind
Posted Feb 11, 2009 05:56
0
And you're telling me that social sciences does not encompass law?nice...
And you're telling me that social sciences does not encompass law?nice...
Posted Feb 11, 2009 19:23
0
forget world rankings yet consider a social science ranking as equivalent to law? hm, dod you logic go out the window?
and if you wish to pursue a conversation I suggest you attempt to read what I wrote, I didn't say social science isn't covering law, but its not a law ranking, hence does not reflect LSE's law school.
forget world rankings yet consider a social science ranking as equivalent to law? hm, dod you logic go out the window?
and if you wish to pursue a conversation I suggest you attempt to read what I wrote, I didn't say social science isn't covering law, but its not a law ranking, hence does not reflect LSE's law school.
and if you wish to pursue a conversation I suggest you attempt to read what I wrote, I didn't say social science isn't covering law, but its not a law ranking, hence does not reflect LSE's law school.
Posted Feb 20, 2009 08:30
0
Hey But coming back to the main topic- which do u think is better UCL or KCL? I Have offers for both & I am really confused as to which 1 I should opt for!
Hey But coming back to the main topic- which do u think is better UCL or KCL? I Have offers for both & I am really confused as to which 1 I should opt for!
Posted Mar 07, 2009 01:29
0
I was trying to refrain myself from entering into this argument but when I saw Llisbon in one of the nicknames involved (and considering I am Portuguese), I got this eagerness to reply :)
Just to put things straight: I did my llm in banking and finance at UCL last year. I had friends in all the major UK unis (i.e., Oxbrigde and the three big ones in London [UCL, Kings and LSE] + Queen Mary) doing llms on the same subjects as well as different ones. Additionally, I chatted with many HRs from magic circle firms to try to have a better grasp of the real picture in the UK and in the world.
Obviously, before undertaking the llm, I thoroughly searched rankings and cross-referenced dozens of them...
Some assumptions I am making in order to narrow the scope down and to show what my search was directed at: I wanted a practitioner oriented LLM, so that rules out oxbrigde - they are far too academic, though great unis, without a doubt.
Having said that, and bearing in mind I wanted to work in Europe, only London stood as a really good place to go to, since it is the world's major financial centre - so US unis were discharged ab initio.
LSE:
Great name, due to its huge worldwide marketing and finance department's (not law) reputation. Better reputation outside the UK than indoors. It is an excellent uni but the big names they pull in are not lecturing - see MacDonald for instance for international finance...
UCL:
Very good teachers, not so good facilities, though. Lousy marketing (I think they don't even care...) but people tend to rank it as the top law uni in London - LLB and LLM. The big guns really teach, at least from my experience.
KCL
Good teachers and, at least for my area of law, best designed LLM - really well-balanced, though the entry requirements are far less demanding then UCL's for instance, at least the level of English among KCL's students was lower.
None of these are really that close to oxbrigde when the LLB is concerned, but for a practice oriented LLM, the former surpass the latter... IMO!
Without prejudice to what was said above, I wouldn´t be concerned about law in general. If you are going to London, you can still basically use the facilities of IALS and of every other uni from the University of London, so facilities should be discarded as a factor.
I would rank the Unis in London, in this manner:
UCL
KCL/LSE
Queen Mary
PS: for instance, and going against what I just said: Queen Mary is top notch in Arbitration - they snatched top places in all the international moots (at least in the last couple of years)
In conclusion and wrapping up, cause I got carried away:
I will back up Cana´s (?) opinon. LSE (and KCL a tad as well) is(are) overrated and UCL underrated (outside the UK).
In the UK, most people would top rank UCL - furthermore, this was admitted by like 7 or 8 KCL LLB students that when on to the the LLM with me.
I am sorry fellow countryman, but the truth is LSE's marketing machine is not to be messed with and it does distort and twist reality a bit.
take care!
I was trying to refrain myself from entering into this argument but when I saw Llisbon in one of the nicknames involved (and considering I am Portuguese), I got this eagerness to reply :)
Just to put things straight: I did my llm in banking and finance at UCL last year. I had friends in all the major UK unis (i.e., Oxbrigde and the three big ones in London [UCL, Kings and LSE] + Queen Mary) doing llms on the same subjects as well as different ones. Additionally, I chatted with many HRs from magic circle firms to try to have a better grasp of the real picture in the UK and in the world.
Obviously, before undertaking the llm, I thoroughly searched rankings and cross-referenced dozens of them...
Some assumptions I am making in order to narrow the scope down and to show what my search was directed at: I wanted a practitioner oriented LLM, so that rules out oxbrigde - they are far too academic, though great unis, without a doubt.
Having said that, and bearing in mind I wanted to work in Europe, only London stood as a really good place to go to, since it is the world's major financial centre - so US unis were discharged ab initio.
LSE:
Great name, due to its huge worldwide marketing and finance department's (not law) reputation. Better reputation outside the UK than indoors. It is an excellent uni but the big names they pull in are not lecturing - see MacDonald for instance for international finance...
UCL:
Very good teachers, not so good facilities, though. Lousy marketing (I think they don't even care...) but people tend to rank it as the top law uni in London - LLB and LLM. The big guns really teach, at least from my experience.
KCL
Good teachers and, at least for my area of law, best designed LLM - really well-balanced, though the entry requirements are far less demanding then UCL's for instance, at least the level of English among KCL's students was lower.
None of these are really that close to oxbrigde when the LLB is concerned, but for a practice oriented LLM, the former surpass the latter... IMO!
Without prejudice to what was said above, I wouldn´t be concerned about law in general. If you are going to London, you can still basically use the facilities of IALS and of every other uni from the University of London, so facilities should be discarded as a factor.
I would rank the Unis in London, in this manner:
UCL
KCL/LSE
Queen Mary
PS: for instance, and going against what I just said: Queen Mary is top notch in Arbitration - they snatched top places in all the international moots (at least in the last couple of years)
In conclusion and wrapping up, cause I got carried away:
I will back up Cana´s (?) opinon. LSE (and KCL a tad as well) is(are) overrated and UCL underrated (outside the UK).
In the UK, most people would top rank UCL - furthermore, this was admitted by like 7 or 8 KCL LLB students that when on to the the LLM with me.
I am sorry fellow countryman, but the truth is LSE's marketing machine is not to be messed with and it does distort and twist reality a bit.
take care!
Just to put things straight: I did my llm in banking and finance at UCL last year. I had friends in all the major UK unis (i.e., Oxbrigde and the three big ones in London [UCL, Kings and LSE] + Queen Mary) doing llms on the same subjects as well as different ones. Additionally, I chatted with many HRs from magic circle firms to try to have a better grasp of the real picture in the UK and in the world.
Obviously, before undertaking the llm, I thoroughly searched rankings and cross-referenced dozens of them...
Some assumptions I am making in order to narrow the scope down and to show what my search was directed at: I wanted a practitioner oriented LLM, so that rules out oxbrigde - they are far too academic, though great unis, without a doubt.
Having said that, and bearing in mind I wanted to work in Europe, only London stood as a really good place to go to, since it is the world's major financial centre - so US unis were discharged ab initio.
LSE:
Great name, due to its huge worldwide marketing and finance department's (not law) reputation. Better reputation outside the UK than indoors. It is an excellent uni but the big names they pull in are not lecturing - see MacDonald for instance for international finance...
UCL:
Very good teachers, not so good facilities, though. Lousy marketing (I think they don't even care...) but people tend to rank it as the top law uni in London - LLB and LLM. The big guns really teach, at least from my experience.
KCL
Good teachers and, at least for my area of law, best designed LLM - really well-balanced, though the entry requirements are far less demanding then UCL's for instance, at least the level of English among KCL's students was lower.
None of these are really that close to oxbrigde when the LLB is concerned, but for a practice oriented LLM, the former surpass the latter... IMO!
Without prejudice to what was said above, I wouldn´t be concerned about law in general. If you are going to London, you can still basically use the facilities of IALS and of every other uni from the University of London, so facilities should be discarded as a factor.
I would rank the Unis in London, in this manner:
UCL
KCL/LSE
Queen Mary
PS: for instance, and going against what I just said: Queen Mary is top notch in Arbitration - they snatched top places in all the international moots (at least in the last couple of years)
In conclusion and wrapping up, cause I got carried away:
I will back up Cana´s (?) opinon. LSE (and KCL a tad as well) is(are) overrated and UCL underrated (outside the UK).
In the UK, most people would top rank UCL - furthermore, this was admitted by like 7 or 8 KCL LLB students that when on to the the LLM with me.
I am sorry fellow countryman, but the truth is LSE's marketing machine is not to be messed with and it does distort and twist reality a bit.
take care!
Posted Mar 07, 2009 10:45
0
Hey luroge,
Appreciate getting an opinion from a former UCL LLM student and in the specialization I want to pursue (although I am leaning toward the finance courses than towards the conventional banking). I got offers from UCL and KCL and after comparing the list of courses and teachers( Hooley, Tennekon, Dalhuisen...) I accepted KCL's offer . If I were to read a different subject/LLM (int public laws for ex, I would have chosen UCL but the courses in the finance llm seemed better than those of UCL (this is my personal opinion so I might be in the wrong here.
Hey luroge,
Appreciate getting an opinion from a former UCL LLM student and in the specialization I want to pursue (although I am leaning toward the finance courses than towards the conventional banking). I got offers from UCL and KCL and after comparing the list of courses and teachers( Hooley, Tennekon, Dalhuisen...) I accepted KCL's offer . If I were to read a different subject/LLM (int public laws for ex, I would have chosen UCL but the courses in the finance llm seemed better than those of UCL (this is my personal opinion so I might be in the wrong here.
Appreciate getting an opinion from a former UCL LLM student and in the specialization I want to pursue (although I am leaning toward the finance courses than towards the conventional banking). I got offers from UCL and KCL and after comparing the list of courses and teachers( Hooley, Tennekon, Dalhuisen...) I accepted KCL's offer . If I were to read a different subject/LLM (int public laws for ex, I would have chosen UCL but the courses in the finance llm seemed better than those of UCL (this is my personal opinion so I might be in the wrong here.
Posted Mar 07, 2009 14:40
0
I agree Prof Ravi Tennnekon is very good. I have heard he is an absolute god of international finance law. KCL module for International Business Law is excellent much better than the specialisation module of the other colleges..
I agree Prof Ravi Tennnekon is very good. I have heard he is an absolute god of international finance law. KCL module for International Business Law is excellent much better than the specialisation module of the other colleges..
Posted Mar 07, 2009 16:51
0
absolutely
tennekon (who teachs many int finance modules )and an 1 or 2 other profs are the reasons why i favored kcl over ucl for a finance LLM.
absolutely
tennekon (who teachs many int finance modules )and an 1 or 2 other profs are the reasons why i favored kcl over ucl for a finance LLM.
tennekon (who teachs many int finance modules )and an 1 or 2 other profs are the reasons why i favored kcl over ucl for a finance LLM.
Posted Mar 09, 2009 10:32
0
Llisbon, in one thread you commented that LSE ranks in at 56, whereas UCL KCL ranks in at the top 25 in the world.
Rankings are the interest of many but they should be read correctly. The rankings you mention are "cumultative rankings"; hence, if a school does not have a medical school, for example, it will not fair well in such overall rankings, and this could lead to a school very strong in certain fields (ie LSE) to be misrepresented.
As such, while QS lists LSE in at 66 in its generla ranking, in in field of Social Sciences LSE ranks in at 4 world over.
Hence why those studying towards degrees in fields related to the Social Sciences know of LSE...
Llisbon, in one thread you commented that LSE ranks in at 56, whereas UCL KCL ranks in at the top 25 in the world.
Rankings are the interest of many but they should be read correctly. The rankings you mention are "cumultative rankings"; hence, if a school does not have a medical school, for example, it will not fair well in such overall rankings, and this could lead to a school very strong in certain fields (ie LSE) to be misrepresented.
As such, while QS lists LSE in at 66 in its generla ranking, in in field of Social Sciences LSE ranks in at 4 world over.
Hence why those studying towards degrees in fields related to the Social Sciences know of LSE...
Rankings are the interest of many but they should be read correctly. The rankings you mention are "cumultative rankings"; hence, if a school does not have a medical school, for example, it will not fair well in such overall rankings, and this could lead to a school very strong in certain fields (ie LSE) to be misrepresented.
As such, while QS lists LSE in at 66 in its generla ranking, in in field of Social Sciences LSE ranks in at 4 world over.
Hence why those studying towards degrees in fields related to the Social Sciences know of LSE...
Posted Mar 09, 2009 12:11
0
tinkerbell:
i was the one saying that LSE is one of the best in law...(though LSE really does not need my aknowledgment but i was having an argument with cann i think
tinkerbell:
i was the one saying that LSE is one of the best in law...(though LSE really does not need my aknowledgment but i was having an argument with cann i think
i was the one saying that LSE is one of the best in law...(though LSE really does not need my aknowledgment but i was having an argument with cann i think
Posted Mar 09, 2009 13:07
0
Llisbon, the same argument was thrown out by another individual in a thread; so my comment went out to the general public. Sorry for having mentioned your name.
Good luck, with your chat with Cann...
Llisbon, the same argument was thrown out by another individual in a thread; so my comment went out to the general public. Sorry for having mentioned your name.
Good luck, with your chat with Cann...
Good luck, with your chat with Cann...
Posted Mar 09, 2009 14:11
0
Llisbon, the same argument was thrown out by another individual in a thread; so my comment went out to the general public. Sorry for having mentioned your name.
Good luck, with your chat with Cann...
Tinkerbell, you state the obiovus - obviously a general ranking does not reflect the exact experitise the uni might possess in regards to a specific subject, nor was that what I wrote. I merely made a point in regards to LSE's GENERAL reputation in an overall ranking and kindly asked if someone could provide a speicific ranking for LSE's law school that indicated in was top 10 in the world.
<blockquote>Llisbon, the same argument was thrown out by another individual in a thread; so my comment went out to the general public. Sorry for having mentioned your name.
Good luck, with your chat with Cann...</blockquote>
Tinkerbell, you state the obiovus - obviously a general ranking does not reflect the exact experitise the uni might possess in regards to a specific subject, nor was that what I wrote. I merely made a point in regards to LSE's GENERAL reputation in an overall ranking and kindly asked if someone could provide a speicific ranking for LSE's law school that indicated in was top 10 in the world.
Good luck, with your chat with Cann...</blockquote>
Tinkerbell, you state the obiovus - obviously a general ranking does not reflect the exact experitise the uni might possess in regards to a specific subject, nor was that what I wrote. I merely made a point in regards to LSE's GENERAL reputation in an overall ranking and kindly asked if someone could provide a speicific ranking for LSE's law school that indicated in was top 10 in the world.
Posted Mar 09, 2009 14:57
0
What is obvious to one may not be so for others.
Concerning your last post Cann, I would like to point out how LSE does not have a Law School, it has a Law Department.
The "other individual" in my last post did not refer to you; I actually explicitly stated it was a comment meant for the GENERAL public. I did not deliberately comment on the content of what you had written on until this point; I am doing this for the first time right now. Although this was obvious to me, apparantly it wasnt for you!
I wish you the best of luck with all...
I'm signing out guys!
What is obvious to one may not be so for others.
Concerning your last post Cann, I would like to point out how LSE does not have a Law School, it has a Law Department.
The "other individual" in my last post did not refer to you; I actually explicitly stated it was a comment meant for the GENERAL public. I did not deliberately comment on the content of what you had written on until this point; I am doing this for the first time right now. Although this was obvious to me, apparantly it wasnt for you!
I wish you the best of luck with all...
I'm signing out guys!
Concerning your last post Cann, I would like to point out how LSE does not have a Law School, it has a Law Department.
The "other individual" in my last post did not refer to you; I actually explicitly stated it was a comment meant for the GENERAL public. I did not deliberately comment on the content of what you had written on until this point; I am doing this for the first time right now. Although this was obvious to me, apparantly it wasnt for you!
I wish you the best of luck with all...
I'm signing out guys!
Posted Mar 09, 2009 18:12
0
What is obvious to one may not be so for others.
Concerning your last post Cann, I would like to point out how LSE does not have a Law School, it has a Law Department.
The "other individual" in my last post did not refer to you; I actually explicitly stated it was a comment meant for the GENERAL public. I did not deliberately comment on the content of what you had written on until this point; I am doing this for the first time right now. Although this was obvious to me, apparantly it wasnt for you!
I wish you the best of luck with all...
I'm signing out guys!
I doubt there is any question of understanding that a general ranking does not reflect an individual subject, but that is just me assuming that people on the LLM guide possess that knowledge, my aplogies if that does not apply to you.
you referred to a conversation me and lisbon had earlier in regards to LSE rankings where you mistakenly believed Lisbon said LSE was ranked 56th in the general world ranking, though that in fact was me, so no, this is not the first time you refer to my earlier comments; that was fairly obvious to me and probably would be to you too shall you bother to read your previous posts next time.
<blockquote>What is obvious to one may not be so for others.
Concerning your last post Cann, I would like to point out how LSE does not have a Law School, it has a Law Department.
The "other individual" in my last post did not refer to you; I actually explicitly stated it was a comment meant for the GENERAL public. I did not deliberately comment on the content of what you had written on until this point; I am doing this for the first time right now. Although this was obvious to me, apparantly it wasnt for you!
I wish you the best of luck with all...
I'm signing out guys! </blockquote>
I doubt there is any question of understanding that a general ranking does not reflect an individual subject, but that is just me assuming that people on the LLM guide possess that knowledge, my aplogies if that does not apply to you.
you referred to a conversation me and lisbon had earlier in regards to LSE rankings where you mistakenly believed Lisbon said LSE was ranked 56th in the general world ranking, though that in fact was me, so no, this is not the first time you refer to my earlier comments; that was fairly obvious to me and probably would be to you too shall you bother to read your previous posts next time.
Concerning your last post Cann, I would like to point out how LSE does not have a Law School, it has a Law Department.
The "other individual" in my last post did not refer to you; I actually explicitly stated it was a comment meant for the GENERAL public. I did not deliberately comment on the content of what you had written on until this point; I am doing this for the first time right now. Although this was obvious to me, apparantly it wasnt for you!
I wish you the best of luck with all...
I'm signing out guys! </blockquote>
I doubt there is any question of understanding that a general ranking does not reflect an individual subject, but that is just me assuming that people on the LLM guide possess that knowledge, my aplogies if that does not apply to you.
you referred to a conversation me and lisbon had earlier in regards to LSE rankings where you mistakenly believed Lisbon said LSE was ranked 56th in the general world ranking, though that in fact was me, so no, this is not the first time you refer to my earlier comments; that was fairly obvious to me and probably would be to you too shall you bother to read your previous posts next time.
Posted Mar 09, 2009 21:37
0
cann: what is your problem with LSE or with anyone in general? And why can't you sustain an argument in a professional manner without always taking things personally and attacking the "KNOWLEDGE" of anyone who contradicts you?
I think everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion and I think no one is reading your posts because they simply lack a minimum of common sense!
btw, I am going to KCL and not LSE .
cann: what is your problem with LSE or with anyone in general? And why can't you sustain an argument in a professional manner without always taking things personally and attacking the "KNOWLEDGE" of anyone who contradicts you?
I think everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion and I think no one is reading your posts because they simply lack a minimum of common sense!
btw, I am going to KCL and not LSE .
I think everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion and I think no one is reading your posts because they simply lack a minimum of common sense!
btw, I am going to KCL and not LSE .
Posted Mar 09, 2009 22:13
0
cann: what is your problem with LSE or with anyone in general? And why can't you sustain an argument in a professional manner without always taking things personally and attacking the "KNOWLEDGE" of anyone who contradicts you?
I think everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion and I think no one is reading your posts because they simply lack a minimum of common sense!
btw, I am going to KCL and not LSE .
I stated a mere fact about LSE and you failed to prove me wrong. My problem with you was your inconsistency in your arguments and claiming something to be fact without proof, soemthing that is severly frowned upon in the legal profession. Tinkerbell mentioned our discussion, I merely provided him/her with an explanation to our debate as it seemed to have been missed; the fact that him/her cannot recall commenting on what I wrote is not my problem, sarcasm is met with sarcasm.
I do not think I am the one with the problem; you are the one writing to me without any relevant input or concern. If everyone is entitled to their own opinion, what is your concern with mine?
Well how nice, I guess I will see you there.
<blockquote>cann: what is your problem with LSE or with anyone in general? And why can't you sustain an argument in a professional manner without always taking things personally and attacking the "KNOWLEDGE" of anyone who contradicts you?
I think everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion and I think no one is reading your posts because they simply lack a minimum of common sense!
btw, I am going to KCL and not LSE .</blockquote>
I stated a mere fact about LSE and you failed to prove me wrong. My problem with you was your inconsistency in your arguments and claiming something to be fact without proof, soemthing that is severly frowned upon in the legal profession. Tinkerbell mentioned our discussion, I merely provided him/her with an explanation to our debate as it seemed to have been missed; the fact that him/her cannot recall commenting on what I wrote is not my problem, sarcasm is met with sarcasm.
I do not think I am the one with the problem; you are the one writing to me without any relevant input or concern. If everyone is entitled to their own opinion, what is your concern with mine?
Well how nice, I guess I will see you there.
I think everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion and I think no one is reading your posts because they simply lack a minimum of common sense!
btw, I am going to KCL and not LSE .</blockquote>
I stated a mere fact about LSE and you failed to prove me wrong. My problem with you was your inconsistency in your arguments and claiming something to be fact without proof, soemthing that is severly frowned upon in the legal profession. Tinkerbell mentioned our discussion, I merely provided him/her with an explanation to our debate as it seemed to have been missed; the fact that him/her cannot recall commenting on what I wrote is not my problem, sarcasm is met with sarcasm.
I do not think I am the one with the problem; you are the one writing to me without any relevant input or concern. If everyone is entitled to their own opinion, what is your concern with mine?
Well how nice, I guess I will see you there.
Posted Mar 09, 2009 22:48
0
Cann
I made a general remark; subject specific vs. general rankings were an issue before on this blog (I received a few PMs to this affect). The remark I made was NOT directed specifically at you, it was directed to the public.
The first time I directed a remark particularly -and solely- at you Cann, was in my last post when I pointed out that the LSE has a law department and not a law school.
Getting your facts wrong is also something that is frowned upon in the legal profession.
Cann
I made a general remark; subject specific vs. general rankings were an issue before on this blog (I received a few PMs to this affect). The remark I made was NOT directed specifically at you, it was directed to the public.
The first time I directed a remark particularly -and solely- at you Cann, was in my last post when I pointed out that the LSE has a law department and not a law school.
Getting your facts wrong is also something that is frowned upon in the legal profession.
I made a general remark; subject specific vs. general rankings were an issue before on this blog (I received a few PMs to this affect). The remark I made was NOT directed specifically at you, it was directed to the public.
The first time I directed a remark particularly -and solely- at you Cann, was in my last post when I pointed out that the LSE has a law department and not a law school.
Getting your facts wrong is also something that is frowned upon in the legal profession.
Related Law Schools
Full Profile
London, United Kingdom
821 Followers
948 Discussions
London, United Kingdom
624 Followers
922 Discussions
Hot Discussions
-
Oxford 2024-2025 BCL/MSCs/MJUR/MPHIL/MLF
Apr 23 11:06 AM 112,904 634 -
NYU Applicants 2024-2025
17 hours ago 53,912 233 -
Berkeley LL.M. 2024-25-Traditional Track
12 hours ago 16,447 118 -
Stanford 2024-2025
Apr 24 09:40 AM 33,297 116 -
MCL Cambridge 2024-2025
Apr 23 11:53 PM 12,439 111 -
Penn Carey Law LLM 2024/2025 applicants
Apr 15, 2024 16,283 111 -
Columbia LLM 2024/25
Apr 16, 2024 25,301 103 -
Yale 2024/25
Apr 06, 2024 14,857 74
