I likely will be applying for Tax LLM programs for the upcoming 2009-10 year. By the time I finish, I would be 43 years old. Any thoughts on whether this would be seen by potential employers as a positive, a liability, or not an issue at all?
I have been practicing law for 3 years (4 by the time I would hopefully begin a program). I also have 15 years work experience prior to law school. No tax experience, so in the eyes of a firm (either law firm or big 4), I would definitely be a first year associate competing with much younger applicants I would guess.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Is My Age An Issue?
Posted Aug 15, 2008 13:22
I have been practicing law for 3 years (4 by the time I would hopefully begin a program). I also have 15 years work experience prior to law school. No tax experience, so in the eyes of a firm (either law firm or big 4), I would definitely be a first year associate competing with much younger applicants I would guess.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Posted Aug 16, 2008 00:48
I think if that is the thing that you wanna do and you have a very strong reason for pursuing the LLM in taxation and you are ready to sit at the same position as other younger candidates, I dnt see any reason why you wont be accepted by any university..
Posted Aug 16, 2008 12:45
I've just graduated alongside a number of candidates who are now going to do there BVC aged 50 (give or take) and with no related legal experience so I would say your age wont be an issue at all. Good luck!
Posted Aug 24, 2008 12:09
I agree. If that is what you want to do from the bottom of your heart, dont let issues like age come in your way.
That can also be percieved as a positive point - someone doing the time with grit and determination. But just make sure that it is what you want really to do.
That can also be percieved as a positive point - someone doing the time with grit and determination. But just make sure that it is what you want really to do.
Posted Aug 26, 2008 00:01
No, age should not be an issue at all. Many legal professionals choose to pursue an LL.M. to specialize in a particular law field (as an LL.M., I admit that most of my colleagues were in their 20s, but there were several colleagues in their 40s as well).
It's a continuing legal education that is appreciated both by the accepting law school and by potential employers.
Good luck!
It's a continuing legal education that is appreciated both by the accepting law school and by potential employers.
Good luck!
Posted Aug 26, 2008 19:02
Even though age should not be a vital consideration; you still have to pay some attentions to something negative.
Posted Aug 26, 2008 21:52
Hi
I am, also, in my 40s and starting my LL.M in September 2008.
Though I qualified as a lawyer nearly 15 years back, I have been a Financial Consultant all my life.... but now thinking of starting my own law firm in the near future....
I have joined LL.M in Criminal Litigation and ultimately want to start a law firm specialising in Criminal and Immigration matters....
I am, also, in my 40s and starting my LL.M in September 2008.
Though I qualified as a lawyer nearly 15 years back, I have been a Financial Consultant all my life.... but now thinking of starting my own law firm in the near future....
I have joined LL.M in Criminal Litigation and ultimately want to start a law firm specialising in Criminal and Immigration matters....
Posted Aug 28, 2008 09:34
LL.M.'s in taxation are extremely common, and in the U.S., they are one of the few areas in which J.D.'s can pursue an LL.M. in the U.S. without being thrown into the academic/professorial track. In your field, I think there is a strong argument for your pursuing an LL.M.
Yes, be prepared for almost all the LL.M.'s you will study with to be in their mid- to late-20's, but I don't see any school refusing admission to a qualified student on the basis of age. The LL.M. must make financial and professional sense for you, and your age may be a relevant personal consideration, but I would be surprised and disappointed to learn that it is a relevant consideration to admissions directors. Go for it!
Yes, be prepared for almost all the LL.M.'s you will study with to be in their mid- to late-20's, but I don't see any school refusing admission to a qualified student on the basis of age. The LL.M. must make financial and professional sense for you, and your age may be a relevant personal consideration, but I would be surprised and disappointed to learn that it is a relevant consideration to admissions directors. Go for it!
Posted Aug 30, 2008 01:05
Thank you all for the posts. I appreciate all of the input. I agree with most that age should not be an issue, but I am at the point where I want to consider all factors before dedicating the time, energy, and money to this endeavor.
Thanks again to all that responded, and good luck to everyone in their pursuits.
Thanks again to all that responded, and good luck to everyone in their pursuits.
Hot Discussions
-
Georgetown LLM 2024/2025 applicants
Nov 16 09:22 PM 40,095 209 -
Stanford 2024-2025
Nov 07, 2024 35,066 117 -
NUS LLM 2024-25 Cohort
Oct 25, 2024 5,856 34 -
Warwick or Birmingham
Nov 10, 2024 1,162 5 -
NUS LLM cohort 2025/26
Nov 17 05:40 PM 471 5 -
EU citizen barred in the US -- will an LLM from an EU school help me practice law somewhere in the EU?
Nov 15 12:58 AM 137 4 -
NUS vs Peking
Nov 09, 2024 183 4 -
LLM in ADR
Oct 23, 2024 390 4