Law teaching at the Yale Law School
By tmalmine in Law According to Yale on Mar 24, 2007
I promised to post something on law teaching at Yale. Law is taught somewhat differently in American law schools than, say, in European universities. In this posting, I wish to highlight some of the great courses I've had here. This is an entirely uncritical post; it should be read as an recommendation to some classic Yale courses. But first a few words about teaching in general.
A typical course here lasts the entire semester, sometimes they are year-long. Course meeting often take place once a week but occasionally every day (Calabresi's Torts) or three times a week (Ellickson's Property). The course closes with an exam or with submission of a seminar paper.
The main difference between my previous legal studies and studies at Yale is that you actually have to read something before the class meeting. The length of assignments varies from 40 pages to 800-page volumes. Because one is simultaneously participating in 3-5 courses, weekly readings can be enormous. No one reads everything, I fear. It's impossible. I tried to read as much as I could, but often just skimmed through the material. The readings can be books, articles, or (most commonly) book chapters and excerpts from articles (and cases, of course). This is very nice. In Europe I read textbooks. Course materials here have been gathered from various sources and that makes them more interesting than textbooks.
Another big difference between Europe and America is the way teaching is conducted. Europeans still rely on lecturing: class discussion is not very lively. At Yale, most class meetings consist of student discussion moderated by the professor. Somewhat paradoxically, my best course here was lecture-based (see below).
One distinctive fact about teaching at YLS is the almost complete absence of "Socratic method." Only professor I have met here who actually practices it is Robert Ellickson. Even his approach is quite different from the legendary Professor Kingsfield of the Paper Chase fame. My feeling is that Socratic teaching has lost some of its former status, perhaps because legal studies have become more interdisciplinary.
Here's some my favorite courses at Yale.
History of the Common Law (Professor John Langbein)
This course is a classic. Professor Langbein has been teaching it for decades (first at Chicago). He is one the leading historians of the common law, especially its procedure. The course covers almost the entire history of the subject, from the 11th century to the legal realist revolution. The emphasis is on the law of procedure, but trusts, contracts, and crime are discussed as well. The class materials are excellent. Professor Langbein lectures, and although students are allowed to ask questions, class discussion is mostly absent. I found this superior method of teaching legal history. Not many students can discuss the topic competently. This is a superb course, and if you have even the slightest interest in legal history, take this course!
Property (Professor Robert Ellickson)
Another Yale classic. Professor Ellickson is generally recognized as the best class-discussion moderator of the school. His course covers the economic, historical, philosophical, and psychological dimensions of property law, but the main issue is land ownership. Meetings usually begin with a short introduction, followed by class discussion. The materials are fascinating. Highly recommended!
Some other courses I suggest you to take a look at are:
The Social Organization of Law (taught occasionally by Austin Sarat, who visits Yale every now and then). Covers issues like self-defense, capital punishment, police violence, prerogative of pardon etc. Sarat is an excellent teacher.
Legal history and comparative law by James Q. Whitman. Professor Whitman is one of the most interesting figures in these fields, but it's not certain whether he will be here next year.
Law and religion by Anthony Kronman. Professor Kronman is conducting research on this topic and teaches annually a seminar on related topics (this year Hobbes, Spinoza, and the Enlightenment Critique of Religion). He's a great teacher and a very nice man.
Well, here are some glimpses at the law teaching here. If you accept Yale's offer, you will be granted access to law school intranet, where you will find more student assessments. Look at them carefully. The semesters begin with a shopping week; during that time students are allowed to add and drop courses at will and to go from classroom to classroom to see if they like the teacher. Use the opportunity.
If you have further questions about courses etc., leave a comment here.
Best,
ToniComments
tmalmine, Sep 09, 2007 20:40
Dear Lit,
I was mostly a scholar before embarking on my LL.M. studies and hence no adjustments were necessary.
Lit, Jul 25, 2007 14:53
Hi Toni, I think you might have worked before deciding to pursue you LLM, right? And if I remember correctly you're at Yale with your fiancee?
1)How did you find the financial adjustment, from being a (presumably) well-paid attorney to being a (presumably again) hand-to-mouth student?
2) The mental adjustment, to thinking academically again instead of mostly pragmatically? Assuming there was an adjustment at all?
tmalmine, Jun 26, 2007 13:49
Mural,
you can send me a personal message, my address is firstname.malminen@yale.edu
mural, Jun 20, 2007 10:16
also what are odds of getting funding for the llm at yale?
mural, Jun 20, 2007 10:16
Hi Toni, many thanks for your response. i have a non-law degree from oxford and gave my exams for the law conversion course recently in uk. could you please ask your oxbridge friend what level of marks are required to get in to Yale ok-ish? also if he/she has some knowledge of what level of marks may be required for the law conversion it would help me a lot. i know i will only know by submitting my application but still if you might be ok with my having your email addy so i can discuss my options with you in further detail. i am not too comfortable with public platforms such as this one. thanks a million!
tmalmine, Jun 01, 2007 01:33
Paavo: olen hakenut oikeushistorian ja roomalaisen oikeuden assistentin virkaa, mutta päätöstä ei ole vielä tehty (tai ainakaan annettu tiedoksi).
En ihmettele, että suunnittelet paluuta Suomeen, minulla ainakin on koti-ikävä.
Mural: my classmate with an Oxbridge pedigree told me that you still need good grades, even though having gone to these universities is a merit. The admissions committee, however, makes an overall assessment of each applicant, so we suggest you apply in any case.
If you have no formal teaching experience, you might try to volunteer to teach. And publications count, for sure, even if they have not been published in "top" periodicals.
Best,
Toni
mural, May 26, 2007 16:57
Hi Toni,
Just wanted to confirm how important grades are for the Yale LLM if one has a degree from Oxford or Cambridge but not necessarily top marks in the degree or rank in class? Also will certificate courses in law from other top schools help with admission? Finally, what kind of demonstrated interest in law teaching or research can you suggest that might impress selectors if one doesnt have formal law teaching experience? thanks a ton :)
pkotiaho, May 24, 2007 21:20
Dear Toni,
First things first: thank you for the enlightening blog. It is inspiring to read of the experiences of such a distinguished countryman. In fact, reading your blog has helped me in my decision to return to Finland to pursue the University of Helsinki's LL.M. diploma next year. So my question to you is, and I do apologise that it has nothing to do with Yale, are you teaching in Helsinki next year? Best of luck towards the finals,
Paavo Kotiaho
tmalmine, May 01, 2007 03:53
Dear Fernando,
Nice to hear from you. Here are the rules:
1) most opt for 12-16 credits. Courses vary. I took two single-credit courses in the fall. On the other hand, torts was four credits. All in all I took 6 courses in the fall (one was a reading group) and five in the spring. This is bit more than average, I suppose. Most student have four courses per term.
2) If you take more than 16 credits per term, you need a permission. I do not suggest overload, most students have hard time keeping with the coursework for 12 credits.
3) See 1.
4) It is not mandatory. I did some independent research and many students did, but it's completely voluntary.
6) It's the maximum.
Take care,
Toni
fernando munoz, Apr 30, 2007 02:06
Dear Tony: I have some questions for you. The issue is the number of courses per term is possible to take at LLM in Yale.
1) How many courses do the average student take each term?
2) How many courses are considered to be too much?
3) How many courses did you take on each term?
4) Is it necessary to take units of independent research and writing for credit? Did you have to take them?
5) Is the 6 units of independent research a limit or a minimum?
Thanks for your help!
tmalmine, Mar 25, 2007 13:58
Hi Roscoe (it's a great nickname for someone going to study at HLS, by the way. Have you seen a picture with Professor Pound sitting behind his enormous round table he had in his office? That's what you should aspire for:)
One reason I like Ellickson is that he doesn't try to intimidate students; if someone can't answer, he just asks someone else, instead of embarassing the student. So I agree with you: Socratic method can be used very efficiently, too, it depends on your attitude.
Some criteria for choosing courses:
The teacher: this is the most common criterion. You will take Duncan, no doubt. I was certain in advance that I would take Langbein and Klarman (and Whitman had he not been on leave).
The topic: I took Hobbes and Spinoza, because it sounded fun and Kronman had a good reputation. This is rather straighforward criterion. If there is a seminar that is directly related to your research interests, it will probably be a good choice.
Other students' comments: during the shopping period, one should discuss with other students, see what courses they're taking and whether they like them or not. This is very good way to gather information.
Fun: well, it's academic fun, but one should take something "weird" or extraordinary. Many students in our program elected The Book of Job. Now they're reading the Good Book, some for the first time, and discussing its politico-legal dimensions. It sounds like a lot of fun and everyone really digs the course.
My feeling is that LL.Ms usually get well along. Because students come from all over the world, there is not so much competition (many are going back aftewr their LL.M.). People who have similar interests, take the same courses. That's where you meet people with whom you can share your thoughts with.
Just one anecdote I heard from a guy who did his LL.M. at HLS last year. In the very first day someone introduced himself by saying "I'm Mr X, and I am so talented, tell me one good reason why I should get to know you". What a prick. And guess what: he was German. But at the end of the day he was a nice guy, too. So don't worry: everyone gets along fine and you will meet lots of interesting and nice people in Cambridge.
I'm looking forward to hearing more from your study plans etc.
Best,
Toni
roscoe, Mar 25, 2007 03:06
first of all: glad 'our' Toni is back! we the fans sure missed his post. as for the socratic method: I never really got the aversion most obviously have with it. I tried it here in Germany in my classes with freshmen (and women) and the results are amazing. I especially have always been disappointed with One L and his, pardon me, sometimes whining author who seemed to go on and on about a method that he seemed to take way too seriously - to say the least. then, on the other hand, I always dug the critique of Duncan Kennedy and others who mocked the terror and horror side of the whole thing, and surely it is very differend for the JDs who face life-changing experiences there. Anyhow, I shouldn't talk about something I have yet to experience on full scale. Just a little apology of the socratic method (wow, that's one intellectual pun there, innit?).
Keep up the good work, Toni, and: perhaps you could add some information for all of us on how to pick the courses and what measures you and the others tend to use in picking them. Also, how is the atmosphere among the ll.m.s? Is it easy to make friends, scholar-soulmates (you know what I mean...), do you guys discuss jurisprudence stuff at all etc.?
Oh, and don't make us wait that long again, will ya?
LLM News
LLM Articles
How LL.M. Grads Keep Their Cool (and Their Grades)
Nov 22, 2024
A graduate degree can be stressful but with some planning, it can be manageable. From creating a schedule to making sure you have time to unwind, finding a balance with your personal life is within reach.
Why Tech Law is the Hot New LL.M. Focus in an AI Era
Nov 14, 2024
Schools are helping lawyers prepare for a fast-changing legal world impacted by AI and developing technology. Students can benefit from a cutting-edge curriculum and new job opportunities.
Connect with Top California Law Schools
Nov 07, 2024
The California Law LL.M. Consortium is giving prospective students in Milan and London the opportunity to meet school and admissions representatives. They will hear about top legal issues and learn about how a U.S. LL.M. can benefit their careers.
Leaping Back into Firm Life After an LL.M.
Nov 05, 2024
Leaving school behind can feel daunting but if a graduate understands the different expectations and is conscious of new technology, it can make returning to a firm that much easier.